Talk:Cape Canaveral Launch Complex 36

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Spaceflight Mid‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Aviation / Technology / North America / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

SpaceX speculation

This sentence was in the lead section of the article:

It was speculated that the SpaceX Falcon launch vehicles might use the launch site, however when the decision to build a Falcon launch site at Canaveral was made, LC-40 was chosen instead.

It was unsourced. Can anyone provide a reference asserting SpaceX considered LC-36 for Falcon? (sdsds - talk) 00:53, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Launch thrust of the older rockets that used LC36?

Now that we know the target launch thrust of the Blue Origin New Glenn ("...seven BE-4 methane/oxygen engines producing 17.1 meganewtons (3,850,000 lbf) total thrust."), wondering what was the order of magnitude of the launch thrust when the older US government inspired rockets used this LC? N2e (talk) 18:25, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress - Nov 2019 - resolved ?

There is a move discussion in progress on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spaceflight which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 18:47, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress - Apr 2020 - resolved ?

There is a move discussion in progress on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spaceflight which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 08:32, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can we delineate LC36A

Can we delineate LC36A - the part that was leased to Moon Express - Was it flat, or did it have any buildings or tower ? - Rod57 (talk) 11:03, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can we say what Blue Orgin are adding, changing, and keeping for their New Glenn launch facilities

Can we say what Blue Origin are adding, changing, and keeping for their New Glenn launch facilities ? eg they are keeping and reusing the ramp, flame trench and deluge pit - but what else ? What are they removing, and what will be new ? - Rod57 (talk) 11:08, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]