Talk:Snow leopard

File:Snow leopard portrait.jpg to appear as POTD

Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Snow leopard portrait.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on March 2, 2015. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2015-03-02. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:38, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Picture of the day

A portrait of a snow leopard (Panthera uncia) at the Rheintal Zoo in Germany. This species of big cat in the genus Panthera is native to the mountain ranges of Central and South Asia. The snow leopard's adaptations for life in a cold, mountainous environment include a stocky body, thick fur, small rounded ears to minimize heat loss, and a short muzzle with unusually large nasal cavities that help the animal breathe the cold, thin air.Photograph: Tambako The Jaguar

Tibet

I would like to point out that this article makes no mention of Tibet where a great number of snow leopards live. It does not mention the Tibetan name for a snow leopard. By calling Tibet China you create confusion- and it is introducing politics into a wild life subject.86.140.234.246 (talk) 09:03, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Looks like it says Tibet to me. First paragraph, last sentence, "Distribution and habitat" section. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:00, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

I don't see Tibet in the Range Country table, either- did someone remove it? Tibet's been a separate place for hundreds of years. Tibet is Tibet. Why isn't it listed? TBH that's the area I think of when I hear the term "snow leopard." Just curious. Tabbycatlove (talk) 20:35, 22 February 2017 (UTC) Tabbycatlove (talk) 20:35, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

See this. — Punëtori' Rregullt 17:35, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Emblematic use - Wrongful Ossetian reference?

Given the range of the Snow Leopard (Himalayas primarily), it seems unlikely Ossetia would use it in its emblem . The more so since the Caucasian/Persian leopard is endemic to the Ossetia region (located in the Caucasus). (Its depiction in the coat of arms is also closer to a Persian Leopard rather than a Snow Leopard)

Not being an expert of the region however, would make sense someone verifies and corrects this?

Cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.145.63.201 (talk) 09:06, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

I think you are correct; based on range, this is very unlikely to depict a snow leopard, and only specific (literally) mentions I can find for the identity of the emblematic animal say "persian leopard". Amended, but better sourced opinions naturally welcome.--Elmidae (talk · contribs) 09:22, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 28 May 2017

While to a ignorant person a snow leopard and a leopard (Panthera pardus) may seem like same species but different subspecies, they are in fact not and snow leopard is a misnomer. I understand that ounces are called snow leopards mainly because their coat colors are similar to the coat colors of a leopard.

Snow leopards and leopards are not the same species. Calling them snow leopard promotes the thinking that snow leopards are biologically closer to leopards than they actually are. In fact, leopards are more related to lions than to snow leopards!

Therefore I strongly recommend that the title of this article "Snow leopard" be renamed to "Ounce".I suggest creating a redirect link "ounce" that leads to this article.

Ounce is a nickname? Words have the meaning to which we assign them to!

Gyrkin (talk) 23:02, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Not done: That sounds like a nickname, and definitely not the primarily recognized definition of the term over the weight measurement. A link already exists in the Ounce (disambiguation) page, I feel this is all that is needed. — IVORK _Discuss 23:09, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Not done: You're going to want to read WP:COMMONNAME. Cannolis (talk) 23:46, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 25 August 2017

In 2015, The Adams Morgan Writing Group published DC Je t'aime: A Short Story Collection that features an escaped snow leopard as a running theme through all of its stories. Robertkmoore40 (talk) 13:39, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. — IVORK _Discuss 14:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Snow leopard population estimates.

In the first paragraph, the last sentence currently says: "As of 2016, estimates for the size of the global population vary from at least 4,080 to about 8,700 individuals.[3]"

This is misleading. A global population estimate that quotes these numbers was indeed published (see source), but it is not based on peer-reviewed data, and it's validity is disputed by a significant number of experts. See e.g. for details.

I suggest therefore to add the following sentence to the paragraph: "However, there is currently no peer-reviewed assessment of the global population that is widely accepted by experts in the field."

For context only: The question of population size is at the core of a larger dispute about the snow leopard's Red List status. Later this month, the IUCN is expected to change the status from Endangered to Vulnerable, which is again being met by some experts with praise, and by others with opposition. See for example.

Once this change becomes official, the Wikipedia page will need to be edited accordingly. It's critical that both sides of the debate be given adequate and fair consideration.

Disclosure: I work for Snow Leopard Trust, one of the organizations disputing the claims of a higher population. MatthiasFi (talk) 11:20, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

It strikes me that there are too many numbers mentioned in the opening paragraph of the article and that they are poorly described. It might be better to put a simple statement that the snow leopard was declared endangered in 2003 based on a declining population and estimates of [the IUCN numbers given then] and possibly add that the current global population is being debated. Then leave the discussion of the different sets of numbers for the population section of the article, where it can be more fully explained. Any reassessment can be added to the lede when it happens.   Jts1882 | talk  13:16, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

References

Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit semi-protected}} template. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 13:47, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 13 October 2017

"In 2013, government leaders and officials from all 12 countries encompassing the snow leopard's range (Afghanistan, Bhutan, China, India, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyz Republic, Mongolia, Pakistan, Russia, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan) came together at the Global Snow Leopard Forum (GSLF) initiated by the President Almazbek Atambayev of the Kyrgyz Republic, and the State Agency on Environmental Protection and Forestry under the government of the Kyrgyz Republic." to "In 2013, government leaders and officials from all 12 countries encompassing the snow leopard's range (Afghanistan, Bhutan, China, India, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyz Republic, Mongolia, Nepal, Pakistan, Russia, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan) came together at the Global Snow Leopard Forum (GSLF) initiated by the President Almazbek Atambayev of the Kyrgyz Republic, and the State Agency on Environmental Protection and Forestry under the government of the Kyrgyz Republic." BibekRajShrestha (talk) 14:48, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Nihlus 18:47, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

The request was to add Nepal to the lists of countries. It's hard to see the difference in the two versions. As the text mentioned 12 countries and only listed 11 of the range countries I made the change. The whole section is without a citation, though, so I've added the citation needed template.   Jts1882 | talk  12:47, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Incorrect numbers given in 1st paragraph

The last line of the first paragraph of this article says that "As of 2016, the global population was estimated at 4,678 to 8,745 mature individuals.[1][3]"

These numbers do not correspond with the numbers in the sources that are provided.

Source [1] in the article (), in fact states that the number of mature individuals was between 2,710-3,386.

The second source provided, which is a book, rather than a peer-reviewed publication, does not mention the category of "mature individuals" at all, and is therefore not relevant to the numbers provided.

The paragraph also omits the fact that a wide range of population estimates currently exist, and that there is an ongoing dispute in the scientific community as to their respective validity.

For instance, the Global Snow Leopard & Ecosystem Protection Program (GSLEP), in which all snow leopard range countries are represented, estimates the population to be at 3,920 - 6,390 individuals. Source:

It is requested that the last line of the paragraph be changed as follows:

"As of 2016, the global population was estimated at 2,710 to 3,386 mature individuals.[1]"

If deemed necessary by the editors, additional information can be added to reflect the fact that there are various, widely different population estimates (as pointed out in source [1] above, but not mentioned in the article, and to further point out that these are all "guesstimates at best", as stated in the Snow Leopard Survival Strategy (), MatthiasFi (talk) 02:25, 11 March 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by MatthiasFi (talk • contribs) 13:10, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

References

Range

Discussion of range is incomplete. According to the map, the snow leopard ranges into China, including the regions of Xinjiang Uigur, Inner Mongolia, and, apparently, Gansu. Tibet is mentioned, but that should more correctly be recast as China, specifically, Xizang Zizhiqu region. 2601:589:4B00:7AB:3D5F:87F6:3435:67EC (talk) 02:33, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Since 2008

I'm unable to locate a citation to confirm:

"Since 2008, it is considered a member of the genus Panthera based on results of genetic studies."

McCarthy and Chapron state in 2003 that it is considered Pantherinae citing articles from 1978 and refer to it as Uncia uncia. See, page 13:

http://www.catsg.org/fileadmin/filesharing/3.Conservation_Center/3.4._Strategies___Action_Plans/Snow_leopard/McCarthy_et_al_2003_Snow_leopard_survival_strategy.pdf

They then later cite articles referring to panthera uncia. First, on page 61 and notably a reference is made to Blomqvist, L. 1978 which refers to the species as panthera uncia.

Furthermore, the wiki article includes an image showing snow leopard as a member of panthera in 2006. The phylogeny section states that snow leopards were identified as related to tigers in 2006, which was confirmed in 2009. But there is no mention there either of 2008 or what would have motivated a move to genus Panthera in 2008.

I'm not sure what the authoritative body for genus placement is, but given the lack of citations, it appears to me that 2008 could be in error. Andwats (talk) 04:03, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

In 2008, the IUCN Red List for snow leopard was updated, and assessors recognised it as a Panthera species. The genetic study referred to is Johnson et al. (2006). -- BhagyaMani (talk) 06:30, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

All the genetic studies linked are 2006. The earliest available assessment from IUCN is 2002 and also seems to indicate the taxonomy Panthera uncia. See:

https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/22732/9381502

To me it looks more accurate to say that there has always been discussion about classification but since genetic studies in 2006, it has been included in Panthera. That consensus is unclear. ITIS, for instance, lists Panther uncia as invalid and then indicates Uncia uncia is the valid taxonomy:

https://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=933420#null

Andwats (talk) 16:59, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Yeah to my knowledge the valid taxonic name is still Uncia uncia even though snow leopards are placed in Panthera I can try to take a look to see if some journal articles of this year have come out focused on the snow leopard, and see what binomial name they are using as well. As of right now I believe it is fully accurate.Mcelite (talk) 05:44, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

I think the placement is correct. I don't see a specific date to when that change happened. It seems to have always been considered panthera by some scholars, which is reinforced by genetic studies going back to the 1980s. BhagyaMani edits are appropriate, in my opinion. Andwats (talk) 15:41, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Historically there has been considerable variation on whether the snow leopard got placed in its own genus, Uncia, or got included in Panthera. While all other Panthera species were considered more closely related, this was largely a subjective judgement on where the line should be drawn for different genera. The molecular evidence placing the snow leopard as sister to tiger makes Panthera paraphyletic with respect to Uncia if two genera are used, which is why the snow leopard is now placed in Panthera by recent taxonomic sources. The IUCN Specialist Cat Group taxonomy is now used on all Felidae articles.   Jts1882 | talk  16:46, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Snow panther

As the article is protected, I suggest here to edit the beginning: Snow panther, often called snow leopard (though not leopard) or sometimes ounce... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nemohuman (talk • contribs) 15:28, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 7 January 2021

203.175.78.174 (talk) 07:09, 7 January 2021 (UTC)                                                                                       I want to make a few minor edits on the Snow leopard in Pakistan.

Ahmad hassan

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. --TheImaCow (talk) 10:30, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Suggestions for improvement

Major concerns:

• The exhaustive list of protected areas is unnecessary.
• The gallery of coats of arms is also unnecessary.
• The Taxonomy section needs a Subspecies subsection, as there seems to be some consensus for three subspecies. A discussion/comparison of the physical differences between subspecies could also be added to the Characteristic subsection.
• The lede also needs work, as it does not adequately summarize the article.
• The subsection for the Global Snow Leopard Forum seems unnecessary and overly long, maybe condense/summarize into one paragraph?

Minor concerns:

• Discuss color variation in Characteristics?
• Etymology section could use some clarification/rephrasing.
• There's a so-so source in the Characteristics section ([30]) - it cites NatGeo, but surely a better source could be found?

Possibly expand:

• Distribution & habitat section is a bit short: maybe start with habitat, then cover range by subspecies?
• Characteristics seems a bit short.
• Cultural significance could almost certainly be expanded.

This isn't a shabby article, and with some love (and elbow grease) could pass GAN, possibly even FAC. Granted, I'd suggest getting it peer-reviewed at some point. Happy editing, --SilverTiger12 (talk) 17:28, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 17 August 2021

The article should include ( in the section that informs of the snow leopard's behavior) the fact that the aforementioned creatures cannot roar, editing the end of this sentence: The snow leopard's vocalizations include meowing, grunting, prusten and moaning. It can purr when exhaling. ExoplanetaryNova (talk) 00:56, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:00, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Snow Leopard in Hemis National Park.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:38, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

remove the semiprotection

it sux 174.27.1.153 (talk) 06:16, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 15 March 2023

=no}}

Add the sentence:

“Heavy predation on domestic livestock appeared to be the likely cause of conflict with the local inhabitants.”
After this sentence: 

“ In the Karakoram, Tian Shan, Altai and Mongolia's Tost Mountains, its main prey consists of Siberian ibex, Thorold's deer (Cervus albirostris), Siberian roe deer (Capreolus pygargus) and argali.” Under the hunting and diet section.

Add the sentence: “Illegal trade in snow leopards (Panthera uncia) has been identified as one of the major threats to long-term survival of the species in the wild.” After the first sentence under the threats section. Pwalu2 (talk) 00:36, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

@Pwalu2: Your citation is paywalled. There's ways to get around it, but we need the article title to get it to work. ◢  Ganbaruby!  (talk) 00:49, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

References

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Snow leopard/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Praseodymium-141 (talk · contribs) 20:14, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

From first glance, article sems fine. Will go through details later.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

   See below.

   b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   See below.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a. (reference section):

   Seems to be.

   b. (citations to reliable sources):

   See below.

   c. (OR):

   None found.

   d. (copyvio and plagiarism):

   Only one violation suspected using Earwig's copyvio detector. That's a mirror site though.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a. (major aspects):

   b. (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   That's fine.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   No recent edit wars.

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

   All images are tagged.

   b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   See below for details.

7. Overall:

   Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

Comments

Picture review

6a. Fine.

6b. Mostly relevant.

• Is there a need to put three different pictures for the Characteristics section? I think that two is more than enough here. ¹⁴¹Pr {contribs} 16:55, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

@Praseodymium-141: Will fix that. Anymore suggestions? Dancing Dollar ^{(let's talk)} 18:16, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Will appear later, I'm just quite busy right now. ¹⁴¹Pr {contribs} 18:37, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

• As a note, I made a series of suggests for improvement some time ago here to assist another editor who was considering taking this article to GAN. I would appreciate it if these suggestions could be addressed? If you are willing, I can copy my suggestions into this review. Happy editing. --SilverTiger12 (talk) 22:30, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

  Yes, that would be great. ¹⁴¹Pr {contribs} 06:08, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Other comments by Praseodymium-141

Mainly prose issues:

• Old French once, which was intended to be used for the Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx), is whence the Latin name uncia and the English word ounce both originate. - change Old French once to The Old French word once at the start of the sentence. Also whence?  Fixed

• supposing that the cat occurred along the Barbary Coast, in Persia, East India and China. - this sentence sounds strange. Fixed

• Based on phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequence sampled across the living Felidae, the snow leopard forms a sister group with the tiger (P. tigris). - add the before phylogenetic analysis and DNA sequence. Fixed

• Genetic divergence time of this group is estimated at 4.62 to 1.82 million years ago. - add the at the start of the sentence. Explain what Genetic divergence time is. The link has the definition, which is very complicated. Dancing Dollar ^{(let's talk)} 18:20, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

• The genetic divergence time of this group is estimated at 4.62 to 1.82 million years ago. The snow leopard and the tiger probably diverged between 3.7 to 2.7 million years ago. - why are there external links? The external link is used to show the time periods more accurately; it's within Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dancing Dollar ^{(let's talk)} 17:57, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

• Felis irbis proposed by Christian Gottfried Ehrenberg in 1830 was a skin of a female snow leopard collected in the Altai Mountains. - added commas after irbis and 1830.  Fixed

• Lots of short sentences in the first paragraph of characteristics.  Fixed

• In Hemis National Park, a snow leopard was observed approaching prey from above, using rocky cliffs for cover; at a distance of about 40 m (130 ft) from the prey, it walked rapidly for about 15 m (49 ft), ran the last 25 m (82 ft) and killed the prey with a bite to the neck. While squatting on its haunches, it ripped out clumps of hair from the abdomen and then opened it to first feed on the viscera. - sounds like a story.  Fixed

• WP:REFBOMBING at the end of conservation.  Fixed

• There are many instances of the word it in the article. I think most of them should be they. The verbs should be pluralised as well if these change.  Fixed

This should cover criteria 1. ¹⁴¹Pr {contribs} 17:50, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

• Do refs 80-84 reference everything before it? If not, more citations should be added. yes Dancing Dollar ^{(let's talk)} 15:33, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

• Are these reliable:
  • ref 4?  Fixed
  • ref 9?  Fixed
  • ref 35?  Fixed It is reliable. Dancing Dollar ^{(let's talk)} 11:07, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

    Sorry, I mean ref 36. ¹⁴¹Pr {contribs} 11:17, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

  • ref 80?  Fixed
  • ref 81?  Fixed
  • ref 83?  Fixed ¹⁴¹Pr {contribs} 10:05, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

• One question - is there a need for an exhaustive list of short statements about the snow leopard's characteristics? This is probably fine for GA though.  Fixed ¹⁴¹Pr {contribs} 15:00, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

  Example: The underbelly is whitish, and its eyes are pale green or grey in color. Its muzzle is short... ¹⁴¹Pr {contribs} 15:54, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Comments by SilverTiger

Major concerns:

• The exhaustive list of protected areas is unnecessary. Done I agree.
• The Taxonomy section needs a Subspecies subsection, as there seems to be some consensus for three subspecies. A discussion/comparison of the physical differences between subspecies could also be added to the Characteristic subsection. Not done It is not necessary.
• The lede also needs work, as it does not adequately summarize the article. Could stand to be a bit longer, but isn't bad. Done added one sentence.
• The subsection for the Global Snow Leopard Forum seems unnecessary and overly long, maybe condense/summarize into one paragraph? Not done There is enough brevity in the subsection.
  • The second paragraph of that section needs a citation, then.

Minor concerns:

• Discuss color variation in Characteristics. Not done I don't think there are color variants
  • Not color variants like white tigers and black jaguars, but color variation across the snow leopard's range.
• Etymology section could use some clarification/rephrasing. Done Rephrased.
• There's a so-so source in the Characteristics section ([31]) - it cites NatGeo, but surely a better source could be found? Done Sourced a published book

Possibly expand:

• Distribution & habitat section is a bit short: maybe start with habitat, then cover range by subspecies? Not done The amount of information on snow leopards is far less than that on lions, tigers, or cheetahs. The section, in my opinion, is sufficiently long and merely covers the salient features of its scope without going into excessive detail.
• Characteristics seems a bit short. Not done It's long enough, I also made it a bit longer.
• Cultural significance could almost certainly be expanded. Done Already expanded, and I added 3 more citations.

These are all more general suggestions, originally listed at another editor's request as some pre-GAN/FAC work, so it isn't precise as the usual GAN nitpicks. --SilverTiger12 (talk) 15:09, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Will apply some of these changes later on tonight. Dancing Dollar ^{(let's talk)} 16:44, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Made another few comments, but overall this article is very good. --SilverTiger12 (talk) 17:10, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: withdrawn by nominator, closed by BorgQueen (talk) 08:27, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that the Snow leopard is able to use its thick tail as a blanket to protect its face when asleep? Source: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2008/06/snow-leopards/chadwick-text/1 , Gish, Melissa (2016). Snow Leopards. ISBN 978-1-56660-746-9.
  • ALT1: ... that the Snow leopard has been depicted on seals including the seal of Almaty and Samarkand? Source: Citations 81-85
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/2006 FIFA World Cup Group A

Improved to Good Article status by Dancing Dollar (talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke (talk) at 01:12, 3 June 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Snow leopard; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

• New enough, long, GA. However Earwig throws a 98.1% violation with one of the links and I was unable to find a direct statement for the original hook in the Nat Geo link. As for ALT1: Citations 81, 82, 84 and 85 threw no hits for Samarqand or Almaty. What is the specific citation? Ashwin147 (talk) 20:50, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Withdrawing as Dancing Dollar has been indeffed as a sockpuppet. Onegreatjoke (talk) 18:42, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 10 February 2024

Change “cats” to “felines” Brycej221 (talk) 22:23, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{Edit semi-protected}} template. RudolfRed (talk) 23:06, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Ounce?

The article says it is commonly known as the ounce. While this does make sense considering the scientific name, I have never heard this before. Is this true? 68.229.156.13 (talk) 19:44, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Yes. Drsruli (talk) 15:00, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 28 October 2024

Snow leopard's status is now Endangered (IUCN 3.1) and its population trend is changed, not decreasing numbers. WKipedieAnn (talk) 11:51, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

@UtherSRG: Can you look at this editor? They are changing IUCN assessments.  —  Jts1882 | talk  12:53, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Looks like all their changes were incorrect and have already been reverted. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:43, 28 October 2024 (UTC)