Jump to content

Talk:Shubert Theatre (Broadway)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Z1720 (talk · contribs) 00:37, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Hi, I will be reviewing this article shortly. Please ping me if there are any questions or concerns. Z1720 (talk) 00:37, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Please see the comments below:

Prose
  • "There were also offices for casting directors, secretaries, and telephone operator;" -> "and a telephone operator" or "and telephone operators"
  • "as well as the revue Padlocks of 1927" -> "and the revue Padlocks of 1927"
  • "and lasted for 1,622 performances through January 1996." Delete for
  • "According to Bloom 2007, p. 232, alternate" Should this say, "According to Ken Bloom, alternate..." With the reference given as a footnote at the end of the sentence?
    • My initial thought was that it was unnecessary to cite "Bloom 2007, p. 232" as a footnote, because it's already in the explanatory note. Upon further thought, it turns out that the rest of the explanatory note ("However, contemporary media refer to the Forbes-Robertson reception being on September 29 and the first show on October 2.") did not have inline footnotes, which I just added now. For consistency, I moved Bloom to a footnote. Epicgenius (talk) 13:42, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Source check
  • References checked: 38, 36, 7, 49, 54, 57, 60, 15, 88, 38, 99
  • Ref 19 didn't work for me
  • No concerns with copyright violations with earwig
  • " and was known as the "third Shubert", -> " and was known "as the third Shubert" to align with what is quoted in ref 69
    • The reason I quoted only the words "third Shubert" is that I'm quoting the phrase used to describe Cohen, rather than the book itself. The words "as the" are technically also in the source, but this is a common phrase. Epicgenius (talk) 12:18, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • There are no footnotes pointing to "Henderson, Mary C. (2004)." Should this be removed from the sources section, and perhaps moved to a "Further reading" section?
Image review

Some captions I think can be better descriptions of the images. For example:

Image licensing was checked and everything seems good.

Conclusion

Please let me know if you have any questions. Z1720 (talk) 01:54, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Z1720: Thanks for the comments. I have responded to all of your comments now. Epicgenius (talk) 13:42, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
My concerns have been addressed, and I will promote this to GA. Please ping me if you have any questions or concerns. Z1720 (talk) 18:11, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Shubert_Theatre_(Broadway)/GA1&oldid=1091396647"