Jump to content

Talk:Sai Baba of Shirdi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleSai Baba of Shirdi was one of the Philosophy and religion good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 25, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
September 28, 2007Good article nomineeListed
September 28, 2007WikiProject A-class reviewNot approved
October 1, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
November 5, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
October 12, 2023Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

early years, 2nd para

[edit]

Baba was notorious for giving vague, misleading and contradictory replies to questions concerning his parentage and origins, brusquely stating the information was unimportant.

This sentence seems too negative, almost pugilist in its approach, while at the same time not being of any significant importance to the overall article. Suggest removing this or adding something more neutral like - Sai Baba was uninterested in talking about his his parentage and origins,often brusquely stating that the information was unimportant

~~Sukisen Sukisen (talk) 07:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's also unsourced; I've replaced it with something more neutral in tone. Harold the Sheep (talk) 03:33, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
~ thanks @Harold the Sheep Sukisen (talk) 07:38, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment page • GAN review not found
Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:35, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lots of uncited prose, including almost the entire "Worship and devotees" section. Z1720 (talk) 02:49, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Edit warring

[edit]

@Nitin3009, you can add those paragraphs back in only if you can provide reliable sources. Per Mathglot's edit comment, "This content may be reinserted if accompanied by a reliable, independent, secondary source." Please read these linked pages to understand how to source the information you would like to add. Crystalespeon (talk) 14:11, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sai Literature

[edit]

A large number of books has been written on Shirdi Sai Baba in various languages, primary sources of information are taken from books, diary, journals, magazines written during Baba's time and books that are written or published after Baba's time. A complete encyclopedia of information is available in a book titled "Shirdi Sai Baba-An inspiring life" <https://harpercollins.co.in/product/shirdi-sai-baba-2/> Abhiarch99 (talk) 11:39, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

THE CHAND MIA SAI WAS A BORN MUSLIM AND HIS FATHER WAS A SPY PLUS THIEF AND ONE YEAR OLD WIKIPEDIA HAD THE TRUTH ABOUT HIM HAD FULL RIGHT VERSION OF HIS BIRTH ETC NOW WHY HAS WIKIPEDIA CHANGED IT AND WRITING IT WRONGLY WHO PAID THEM TO WRITE LIES PLS CORRECT IT — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.37.36.183 (talk) 07:49, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 30 October 2024

[edit]

This page has ben completely scrubbed of all references to the mystical powers that many saints are surrounded by during their lifetimes. There is something extremely insidious happening on Wikipedia, where all references to the above mentioned phenomena are being systematically removed. The page is now incomplete and misleading, certain references must be re-included to give an accurate sense of the life of this great saint, and Wikipedia should really own up to its own deep-seated malignant bias. Rob2841 (talk) 13:21, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Ratnahastin (talk) 13:30, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]