Talk:Ryan Zinke

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ryan Zinke article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Military / Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: Biography / Maritime / North America / United States / Cold War / Post-Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)
	Post-Cold War task force

Montana Low‑importance

	Montana portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Montana, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Montana on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontanaWikipedia:WikiProject MontanaTemplate:WikiProject MontanaMontana
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Pritzker Military Library Low‑importance

	This article is related to the Pritzker Military Museum & Library WikiProject. Please copy assessments of the article from the most major WikiProject template to this one as needed.Pritzker Military LibraryWikipedia:GLAM/PritzkerTemplate:WikiProject Pritzker-GLAMPritzker Military Library-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

United States: Military history / Presidents / State Legislatures / Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Military history - U.S. military history task force.
	This article is supported by WikiProject United States Presidents (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. State Legislatures (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

U.S. Congress Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) person(s).

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on this article (except in limited circumstances)
Changes challenged by reversion may not be reinstated without affirmative consensus on the talk page

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information

Enforcement procedures:

Violations of any of these restrictions should be reported immediately to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard.
Editors who are aware of this topic being designated a contentious topic and who violate these restrictions may be sanctioned by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

Edits made solely to enforce any clearly established consensus are exempt from all edit-warring restrictions.
Edits made which remove or otherwise change any material placed by clearly established consensus, without first obtaining consensus to do so, may be treated in the same manner as obvious vandalism.
In order to be considered "clearly established" the consensus must be proven by prior talk-page discussion.
Reverts of edits made by anonymous (IP) editors are exempt from the 1RR but are subject to the usual rules on edit warring. If you are in doubt, contact an administrator for assistance.
Whenever you are relying on one of these exemptions, you should refer to it in your edit summary and, if applicable, link to the discussion where consensus was clearly established.

The contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topics sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. Remember: When in doubt, don't revert!

Please revert removal

Could you please revert the removal of sourced material by Fred Markey (talk · contribs · Markey WHOIS), it looks like whitewashing for possible financial gain 2001:8003:34A3:800:DC41:DF19:2EC9:4F3C (talk) 21:20, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No Untamed1910 (talk) 21:28, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why not? 2001:8003:34A3:800:DC41:DF19:2EC9:4F3C (talk) 21:31, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Removing sourced material goes against Wikipedia policy. Untamed1910 (talk) 23:09, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly, Fred Markey (talk · contribs · Markey WHOIS) only edit was to remove sourced material and replace it with unsourced material, why should their edit be kept?2001:8003:34A3:800:DC41:DF19:2EC9:4F3C (talk) 01:15, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell the history is: Inserted by Gloveya242 on 5 August 2019. Removed by Willgam on 9 February 2021. Re-inserted by 2001:8003:38c0:900:a117:ca54:b310:567d on 5 April 2021. Re-removed by Fred Markey on 25 June 2021. Re-re-inserted by 110.144.233.67 on 24 May 2024. Re-re-removed by me on 24 May 2024. I don't pretend to know about Mr Zinke's association with a "fraudulent" scheme but I do see that one of the red-linked editors said it's false so the IPs saying "unexplained removal" apparently didn't look as hard as I did. And this request was rejected in 2023. Perhaps one of the IPs would like to persuade and seek consensus? Peter Gulutzan (talk) 14:06, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You redid an edit based on edit reason of "Explanation and typos" even though that is not an edit reason that has anything with the edit of removing sourced material and inserting unsourced as stated directly above.

Why does "Explanation and typos" mean an editor can remove sourced material and add in unsourced?2001:8003:3FB4:CF00:380B:504B:710B:781C (talk) 02:56, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I said, correctly, that one of the red-linked editors said it's false. I linked to the edits I saw. Peter Gulutzan (talk) 15:59, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That was a seperate edit done by unrelated editor to the edit you "Re-re-removed" by your own reckoning and years before Fred Markey inserted the unsourced material that when you "look hard" was removed by PerpetuityGrat because like 2001:8003:34A3:800:DC41:DF19:2EC9:4F3C said it was unsourced.2001:8003:3FB4:CF00:C496:C6DF:D5D1:164 (talk) 05:59, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the first edit, it removed the fully sourced paragraph without references or any policy that prove that is "false". Then it was reversed by another editor with the edit reason "unreferred removal" presumably since Wikipedia is based on reliable sources rather then the unreferenced claims of a one edit account.

I don't see ow their unproven claims of the sources being false relate to someone else overriding material with unsourced claims 2001:8003:3FB4:CF00:C496:C6DF:D5D1:164 (talk) 08:20, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per Peter Gulutzan's above comments pinging @PerpetuityGrat: since Peter Gulutzan thinks that their their reversion of unsourced material was against the rules because Fred Markey (talk · contribs) "said it's false" 2001:8003:3FB4:CF00:596C:9947:38D9:FD8E (talk) 06:57, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 15 October 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Congressman Zinke has converted to Catholicism, he is no longer Lutheran. Below are 2 links to back up the claim:

https://www.kulr8.com/elections/candidate-minute/ryan-zinke-focuses-on-economy-homeownership-in-montanas-1st-district-race/article_4607185c-1ff3-5458-8cab-cb9492d55f08.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wkk5Zf1HcyQ&list=RDNSWkk5Zf1HcyQ&start_radio=1 time stamp 15:01 CharlieRyanR (talk) 17:12, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The balance of sources would seem to indicate this is correct - the more recent ones do quote him saying he's Catholic. Still, it would be really nice to have one that explicitly talks about his conversion, to forestall previous edit requests pointing to the many, many places on the web (like the current Pew survey) that still say he's Lutheran. Are you aware of any sources on that topic? I couldn't find one. PianoDan (talk) 17:43, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now: A dialogue was opened regarding the content of the requested edit and requesting editor has not responded after 30 days. —Sirdog (talk) 09:23, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]