Roma Women's Sevens was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 06 July 2011 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Rome Sevens. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rugby union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rugby union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rugby unionWikipedia:WikiProject Rugby unionTemplate:WikiProject Rugby unionrugby union
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly
Sorry, but the merger decision is something of a nonsense. All of other women's sevens tournaments (indeed rugby tournaments generally) have separate pages from their men's equivalents. Either all should be merged, or none should - to randomly merge one tournament but not the rest is inconsistent.
The main problem seems to be an objection to the page being called the "Roma Sevens" - but that is what the event is called on its English language webpage ([1]) - and in all other publicity and news articles (for instance Scrumqueens - the game's leading English language website). I fail to see why Wikipedia should give the tournament any other name.
Johnlbirch (talk) 9 July 2011
Wikipedia is never going to be consistent due the simple fact that it allows anyone to edit it and people have different ideas on how information should be presented. Also it is not as simple as merging all or none, as some will be notable enough to stay by themselves while others would work better as a section in another article. As to the name, that is a bone of contention here and many battles have been fought over such things as Novak Djokovic or Novak Đoković, Côte d'Ivoire or Ivory Coast etc. Currently the guideline says to use what reliable English sources call it, but in the end it will come down to what WP:Consensus decides. The telegraph [2] uses Roma sevens, while the BBC [3] says Rome sevens so it could go either way. AIRcorn(talk)05:01, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
