Talk:Rent-seeking

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rent-seeking article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 12 months

Business Top‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law High‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Economics Top‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Tullock paradox was copied or moved into Rent-seeking with this edit on 17:11, 30 March 2017. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Tone of article isn't very encyclopedic

Article has a bit too much of the author's voice and reads like a homework assignment or a edutainment video:

"With constantly evolving digital platforms and new business models, individuals or groups are always on the lookout to gain an unfair advantage over others using the government or other institutions."

This is good for maybe an educational pop-science textbook or article but not Wikipedia...Needs to include more "according to X in the reference", etc.TheWikiJedi (talk) 16:46, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. WP:DOIT? :-) postleft ✍ (Arugula) ☞ say hello! 23:34, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This was the result of a massive vandalism attack with made up references. AManWithNoPlan (talk) 00:44, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What ..."was the result of a massive vandalism attack with made up references."?

Thank you. Jamie says Weirding is Real (talk) 16:13, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]