Talk:Refuse & Resist!

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Refuse & Resist! article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Human rights Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Problems of POV, lack of neutrality

This article is absurdly POV—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.60.211.14 (talk • contribs) 00:03, 6 September 2005.

Not to mention sloppy. Feel free to edit it and clean up the POV, grammar, and missing links. Mycota 02:47, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see anything NPOV. Seems to follow what the group preaches pretty well. I think the group is so small that no criticisms exist of the group itself. However, the issues they preach about are pretty controversial. Do criticisms have to exist for every article on Wikipedia? I say we leave the neutrality tag for another month and then after that it gets removed. --Thesilence 14:47, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of a link

I removed the link to Discover the Networks. Who put that up? DTN is a project of reactionary David Horowitz, a rightwing shill who accuses anyone even remotely left of "treason," etc. Nobody on a site like Wikipedia should be citing such a group as a "source" for anything. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.147.222.166 (talk) 02:52, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Templates; missing citations; lack of neutrality

Added the templates due to the problems discussed above. This article appears to be more of an advertisement for the organization than a neutral article about it. It lacks neutral reliable and verifiable citations to sources not published by the organization itself and it appears to be plagiarized from either some of the website's publications or other unacknowledged sources of information. --NYScholar (talk) 23:03, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Restored (and updated) the templates. --NYScholar (talk) 18:08, 15 March 2009 (UTC) Many of the items used as sources have no URLs given and are unverifiable; their reliability is dubious. --NYScholar (talk) 18:10, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]