Talk:Queen of Nations

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

Shipwrecks

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shipwrecks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of shipwreck-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShipwrecksWikipedia:WikiProject ShipwrecksTemplate:WikiProject ShipwrecksShipwreck

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Shipwreck-related priority open tasks:

To Do

Lady Elizabeth (1879)
- Clean up typos Currently working on it-----Completed!
- Improve grammar
- Add any additions if needed Still adding more information
- Discuss desired additions -None

Barque?

The rig of this ship is mentioned as barque in newspaper reports of her wreck. Lloyd's register may be an appropriate source (though they are know to have made a few errors.) ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 20:16, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lloyd's Register of 1880 [1] shows the rig as barque. She is listed as a ship in 1874 to 1875 and as a barque in 1876-77. I could not get the 1875-76 copy to load. ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 21:27, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou. The New York Times in September 1879 also lists her as a "bark", although of course that may be a far less reliable source. Motacilla (talk) 08:17, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Found it! 1875 is the first year that Lloyd's Register lists Queen of Nations as a barque. Thankyou for doing all the tedious work of searching all the editions of Lloyd's Register before and after that year to narrow it down.

The Internet Archive's search function seems to struggle with Lloyd's Register. I suspect there are at least three reasons for this. 1. It depends how common a word one uses as a search term. 2. Before a certain date, Lloyd's sometimes used a long dash instead of the first word of a name. Queen of Australia would be followed by —— of Beauty, —— of Britain, and so on, instead of repeating "Queen" in every name. 3. In some cases, the left hand margin of right hand pages (if you understand what I mean) is too rolled-over to be scanned properly. I find I have to manually turn the electronic pages to search the digitised book the old-fashioned way. Motacilla (talk) 10:12, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder if you are using the most efficient entry point for Lloyd's register of ships. My route in is [2] which, once you choose the year, gives you a slider bar for the right part of the alphabetical listing. Then it is a case of guessing where to move the slider bar to and fine tune with the arrow keys. ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 13:06, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]