Jump to content

Talk:Pooja Hegde

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Pooja Hedge)

Semi-protected edit request on 23 June 2024

[edit]

Add "Y after X".

X: Her second Telugu film, Mukunda, was a romantic-action tale, set in the backdrop of a village, released in late 2014.[58][59]

Y: Directed by Srikanth Addala, the film featured her opposite debutant Varun Tej.[1] The film received positive response upon its release.[2] Hegde impressed many with her memorable performance in the song "Gopikamma".[3][4] 103.166.244.120 (talk) 13:56, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Charliehdb (talk) 16:15, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Kavirayani, Suresh. "I want to be a good actor: Varun Tej". Deccan Chronicle. Retrieved June 23, 2024.
  2. ^ "Mukunda premiers on April 19". The Hans India. Retrieved June 23, 2024.
  3. ^ "Gopikamma song highlight of Mukunda". The Hans India. Retrieved 23 June 2024.
  4. ^ "Gopikamma generates huge buzz from Mukunda". The Times of India. Retrieved 23 June 2024.

Removal of content

[edit]

Why @Krimuk2.0 removed the contents without any valid explanation? Why no-one is responding to it? Also tagging @CanonNi, @Charliehdb, @Espenthordsen and @Sjsjsjs j12345, whose edits were removed. Please undo his vandalism. 2409:4073:2EBC:DD2A:0:0:EF48:3711 (talk) 00:30, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SOCKPUPPETRY. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:30, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
But you have removed their edits. Contents you removed were well-written with reliable sources. Anyone please restore previous version. 2409:4073:4D4E:2481:0:0:EF08:1701 (talk) 00:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dear @Charliehdb, @Espenthordsen and @Sjsjsjs j12345: I read WP:SOCKPUPPETRY. Since he can't startt Sockpuppet investigations, what's the relevance here? As you users have done these edits, you are not any socks. So please revert his last edit. Thanks. 2409:4073:4D87:D52F:0:0:EF08:3108 (talk) 01:41, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA article

[edit]

@User:CNMall41 and @User:Fylindfotberserk: Please help me to promote it a GA Article. Thesanas (talk) 17:05, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Thesanas:, Your editing does not adhere to numerous guidelines in Wikipedia, including that for promotional tone, original research, and referencing. I removed a large amount of content (which was also previously removed by another edit) based on your inaccurate edit summary. I will go through the rest of the page shortly, but in the meantime you will need to read WP:COI and WP:PAID and make the appropriate disclosure if applicable. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:43, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This one's yet another sock from the countless ones that pop up at Pooja's article every few months. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:29, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@CNMall41 I saw you helping User:19Arham at Rashmika Mandanna talk page. I hope you can also help me here. Thesanas (talk) 07:42, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Thesanas:, I'm going to pass but appreciate the offer. You are very good at outing your paths on other pages. Reminds me I need to take a closer look at the pages these farms have worked on to ensure NPOV, referencing, promo, etc. meet guidelines. Thanks.
@Krimuk2.0:, Yup. I was saying this the other day....I would love to start working on some of these pages to do cleanup and expansion but seems like socks would rather occupy my time chasing.--CNMall41 (talk) 17:32, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@CNMall41: Is Indo-Asian News Service a good source or falls under WP:NEWSORGINDIA? Thesanas (talk) 18:00, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Consult the appropriate noticeboard. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:22, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@CNMall41: I don't get what you meant. Please elaborate. Also, what you meant by "COATracking film information"? Thesanas (talk) 18:27, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
See WP:COAT. Should you disagree with the objection to your addition, see WP:ONUS.--CNMall41 (talk) 18:28, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@CNMall41: for adding "The film proved to be a commercial success." sentence? Thesanas (talk) 18:35, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
WP:CIR. That was the removal associated with the edit summary so......yes, for that sentence. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:43, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@CNMall41: Okay, leave that sentence. Other corrections and citations can be restored? Thesanas (talk) 18:48, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No they cannot. They are being objected to based on the edit summary left. Again, see WP:ONUS. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:53, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@CNMall41: other edit was only addition of a source for film Oka Laila Kosam. If needed more than one source can be added. Thesanas (talk) 18:56, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CNMall41: This is the last good version by you in which you removed lines with NEWSORGINDIA. But the other user restored his last version which contains bad sources. Also, can I know what was Promo as you mentioned in your last summary? All the edits that I have done was only with more than one citations for making sure it's reliability. Please check once more. --Thesanas (talk) 03:14, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No need to check again. I checked the first time before I removed it. Please review all edit summaries. Feel free to propose your changes here on the talk page per WP:ONUS as I am not the only one who has objected. Don't ping me here again unless you actually propose content you want added. --CNMall41 (talk) 06:45, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The other editor who objects my edits in the name of sock is having personal hate against me. He even filed a sock investigation against me, but failed. Leave that, I'm restoring your last best edit. Then I will list the citations here so that you can verify them and add it to article. Thesanas (talk) 07:59, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You have already been warned about edit warring. The threat to restore the information without gaining consensus per WP:ONUS is WP:BLUDGEONING the process. Do as you will but if you restore prior to consensus you will be reported and a request to block you from editing will be made. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:00, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Are you trying to tell me not to edit this article? I telling you to please restore your last best edit in which you removed some WP:NEWSORGINDIA citations. Please help me expand this article without avoiding me. Thesanas (talk) 02:25, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I did not say do not edit the page. I said if you add back the content without consensus you will be reported for such. At this point, it seems like a WP:CIR issue and would advise reading WP:DTS and get consensus. --CNMall41 (talk) 02:53, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How can I get get consensus for restoring "your" edit? Thesanas (talk) 03:25, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have removed some references under NEWSORGINDIA and churnalism. If there are more references under this, please remove them too. Thanks. Thesanas (talk) 16:26, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Thesanas:, I fear you are heading for a block or in the least a topic ban. The talk page is here. You were reverted (by two editors now). Discuss per WP:BRD or be reported for edit warring. Choice is yours. --CNMall41 (talk) 07:11, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CNMall41 which is the negative review that was removed? Please tell that. Thesanas (talk) 07:14, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So you're removing content repeatedly without even knowing what you're removing? Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:16, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Krimuk2.0: I just added reliable citations to remove "mcn" template. Can't you just tell the negative reviews that was removed? Thesanas (talk) 07:20, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Read the damn edit summaries and look and what content you removed. Stop wasting everyone's time by asking a question you already know the answer to. You know exactly what you removed. This is getting tiring and wasting everyone's time. --CNMall41 (talk) 07:18, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't invited you all here to revert my edits. Then how I will be wasting your your time. If you are not interested to edit on this topic you can leave. Thesanas (talk) 07:21, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There has been long-term edit-warring, addition of poor sources, removal of tags, among various other issues on this page. Every few months a new account is created to puff up her article. It's now being done by Thesanas and Charliehdb. With very less admin support, CNMall41 and I have been trying to deal with this, but it has been tough. Pinging Fylindfotberserk, Keivan.f, FrB.TG to help deal with this mess. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:39, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Krimuk2.0: Do you suspect sock/meat puppetry? -
I know I wasn't pinged with the question, but I certainly do. Regardless, I think the best route at this point would be to simply remove the unreliable sources and associated content. It is being challenged and anyone wishing to include it would be required to get consensus for such per WP:ONUS. --CNMall41 (talk) 22:06, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I only went through about 10 of the references. Will take a while to do a full cleanup with all the refbombing. Regardless if its FANCRUFT or MEAT, it seems to be a target for promotional content and unreliable sources. --CNMall41 (talk) 22:27, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for removing unreliable sources. I have replaced them with reliable sources. Would like add more content in 'Commercial success and fluctuations (2018–present)' section. Could you help me to get consensus? Or re-add the contents to the section from this best version. Thesanas (talk) 02:37, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]