Talk:Phlegraean Fields

Volcanoes Mid‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Kingdom of Naples (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kingdom of Naples, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Kingdom of NaplesWikipedia:WikiProject Kingdom of NaplesTemplate:WikiProject Kingdom of NaplesKingdom of Naples articles

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Google Scholar

Cleanup

I've added a cleanup tag, the content is fine, but there's a huge gap between the external links heading and the acutual hyperlinks themselves which needs sorting, I couldn't figure out how to do it.

I think I've addressed this problem. If no one objects I'll remove the cleanup tag later. --Burntnickel 18:48, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Supervolcano

The New Scientist, 27 September 2008, p 35, names Campi Flegrei as one of the two main candidates with Yellowstone for the next supervolcano. Perhaps someone competent on the subject could cover this. Dudleymiles (talk) 19:48, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Translation from Italian

The Campi Flegrei article in Italian Wikipedia is very complete though it lacks clear (to me) sources. I've been looking for references to the info there and intend to translate it completely, as articles in English are the main source for articles in all other languages and therefore should present as much info as available. Besides, I've found the information in Campos Flegreos article in Wikipedia in Spanish is also very useful, especially because it's summarised in plain language, though merely a translation of the Italian version. If anyone objects to this, please say so. Thanks. --Izmir2 (talk) 17:11, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Name

Why is this article entitled with the Italian name instead of the English "Phlegraean Fields"? There are plenty of English language sources for the use of "Phlegraean Fields". For starters, see the various articles in the June 1984 Bulletin of Volcanology, such as Bianchi, R. et al. (1984) "Modelling of surface ground deformations in the Phlegraean Fields volcanic area, Italy" Bulletin of Volcanology 47(2): pp. 321-330. If we were to be concerned about classical references, would we not use the Latin Phlegraei campi instead of the Italian? But this is the English Wikipedia. --Bejnar (talk) 22:24, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Smithsonian Global Volcanism Program uses "Campi Flegrei". --Burntnickel (talk) 01:35, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well that explains how the article was originally named, but not why we shouldn't follow the policy in the Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Article titles, namely in Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English), Use the most commonly used English version of the name of the subject as the title of the article. "Phlegraean Fields" is the English version of the name and it appears in numerous reliable sources and encyclopedias. --Bejnar (talk) 15:58, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Italian graphic

File:Caldera_dei_Campi_Flegrei.jpg... -- AnonMoos (talk) 15:04, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Volcanoes Wiped out Neanderthals

Go ogle up Volcanoes Wiped out Neanderthals and you'll find this one is the smoking gun. --Pawyilee (talk) 14:16, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What does that have to do specifically with Campi Flegrei (the topic of this entry)? Are you intending (or have you already done) to sprinkle every article about European volcanoes with this information? It seems that the new study might be mention (with cites and support) in the general volcanism or volcanoes articles. Consider also this might be relevant information on the Neanderthal extinction hypotheses article where there is already a mention. But it pretty much has no relevance here. --Quartermaster (talk) 15:19, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 01:04, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Campi Flegrei → Phlegraean Fields — Phlegraean Fields is the English term for the area. There are plenty of English language sources for the use of "Phlegraean Fields". For starters, see the various articles in the June 1984 Bulletin of Volcanology, such as Bianchi, R. et al. (1984) "Modelling of surface ground deformations in the Phlegraean Fields volcanic area, Italy" Bulletin of Volcanology 47(2): pp. 321-330. We should follow the policy in the Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Article titles, namely in Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English), Use the most commonly used English version of the name of the subject as the title of the article. "Phlegraean Fields" is the English version of the name and it appears in numerous reliable sources and encyclopedias. --Bejnar (talk) 23:41, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support WP:Use English 65.95.14.96 (talk) 04:21, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support. I have no problem with following Wikipedia recommended style guidelines for things like this. Seems pretty uncontroversial. Would expect to see something like "in Italian, Campi Flegrei" retained. --Quartermaster (talk) 14:02, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Would also like to point out that a quick check of the French, German, Spanish, and Italian wikipedias shows they all use translations in their native languages (none use Campi Flegrei). --Quartermaster (talk) 14:04, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Doh! "none use Campi Flegrei . . . except for the Italian wikipedia! Doh! --Quartermaster (talk) 17:45, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support Commonness is not the only principle. But this is what the place is called, and the strength of that argument outweighs saving a few letters.Septentrionalis PMAnderson 02:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Topics which could be added

The geothermal power generated at Pozzuoli
Classical references, beginning with Vergil. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 02:05, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Phlegraean Fields. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:42, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]