This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Theology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Theology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TheologyWikipedia:WikiProject TheologyTemplate:WikiProject TheologyTheology
Philocalia (Origen) is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oriental Orthodoxy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on the Oriental Orthodox Church on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Oriental OrthodoxyWikipedia:WikiProject Oriental OrthodoxyTemplate:WikiProject Oriental OrthodoxyOriental Orthodoxy
I was editing the Origen article to add some links to English translations of his works online when I found a link to the Philokalia. This I knew to be wrong -- Origen studies is interested in the Philocalia, which is not the same as the medieval Greek text of the same title. I checked the links and redirects and found confusion. The only way to remove this is to go through and point links to the correct text, and to create a page for Origen's Philocalia. I don't have a lot of information on hand about it, but at least it should prevent confusion. Roger Pearse (talk) 09:03, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Someone has placed a tag on the page requesting deletion, but no indication as to why other than "no sources". Yet the article is referenced really rather copiously. Roger Pearse (talk) 07:19, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
