Jump to content

Talk:PewDiePie

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articlePewDiePie has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 6, 2012Candidate for speedy deletionDeleted
April 26, 2012Candidate for speedy deletionDeleted
May 26, 2012Candidate for speedy deletionDeleted
July 27, 2012Articles for deletionDeleted
August 26, 2012Candidate for speedy deletionDeleted
March 16, 2013Candidate for speedy deletionDeleted
October 24, 2013Proposed deletionKept
March 20, 2015Good article nomineeListed
April 30, 2019Featured article candidateNot promoted
November 6, 2019Peer reviewReviewed
Current status: Good article

Proposal for Redirect : Pewds to PewDiePie

[edit]

Hi everyone,

I would like to propose that the term "Pewds" be redirected to the PewDiePie Wikipedia page. "Pewds" is a widely recognized nickname for PewDiePie, and redirecting it would help users find the page more easily.

Thank you for considering this suggestion.

Best regards, 180.149.232.102 (talk) 13:07, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@180.149.232.102 Hi guys. This is me. When I create this talk page, I don’t' noticed I was log Out BangladeshiStranger🇧🇩 (talk) 08:10, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You might want to ask an admin to help you delete the message since your IP address will be visible publicly. TylerBurden (talk) 15:11, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

is he the third most subscribed YouTube channel I know T series is the second and Mr beast is the first

[edit]

Idk A Description 2600:8807:1D03:A500:1D08:5CC2:D2C9:5072 (talk) 11:54, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

He is 8th (see List of most-subscribed YouTube channels). Soulbust (talk) 14:47, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

E;R Promotion

[edit]

Kjellberg promoted YouTuber E;R, a content creator who included a Hitler speech in one of his videos. E;R himself is a self-admitted Anti-Semitic nazi, writing on his Gab account, when another user asked him, “What is the best way to red pill people on the Jewish Question,” the owner of the E;R channel responded, “Pretend to joke about it until the punchline /really/ lands.” Should he be referred to as a Alt-right Nazi/definitive anti-semite on this page? JPHC2003 (talk) 06:51, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

E;R was a relatively small moment in PDP's career (I will state that that is my opinion and I'm saying it with the benefit of retrospect, I'm saying it's small in the sense that it really just came and went, especially and relative to the other controversies PDP is associated with) so I think it would be undue to include more than the gist of the situation i.e. PDP recommending small creators to his viewerss, with one said creator being E;R and PDP garnering criticism because of the content in E;R's videos (of which it would be important to include PDP stating he was largely unaware of E;R's other videos), and then PDP removing the reference to E;R from the recommendation video. This is why I'm removing the information of the Steven Universe-related video that E;R made, as it really doesn't have anything to do with PewDiePie and his recommendation of the Death Note video. Referencing The Verge's noting of the situation in the text already incorporates the information about E;R's content being what it is. IMO, we don't need the extra Rebecca Sugar/Steven Universe content. That would be more befitting or relevant to include on an E;R article if that were ever to be made. Or perhaps if used as an example on an article discussing problematic/censored content on YouTube.
As far as referring to the individual creator as such, then no. Unless there are ample amounts of sources referring to him as such. But even then we would have to word it in context, i.e. "E;R has been described as [insert adjective here] by [insert sources here]". It would be better to just refer/describe his content as per the sourcing. Soulbust (talk) 18:16, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, because this article is about PewDiePie, not "E;R".
See also WP:DUE. TylerBurden (talk) 20:25, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect September 2017 bridge incident has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 20 § September 2017 bridge incident until a consensus is reached. Kingsmasher678 (talk) 06:47, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]