This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taiwan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taiwan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TaiwanWikipedia:WikiProject TaiwanTemplate:WikiProject TaiwanTaiwan
Syncretic does not mean leftist. Could you please self-revert your last edit and fix the grammar before re-inserting? Also the sources you use will have to be attributed - one is a very new newspaper and I'm unsure of its reliability. The other appears to be a partisan magazine and, again, is of dubious reliability. As such, these claims should not be made in wiki-voice but should be included only with attibution - "Author X writing for pub Y asserts that," etc. Simonm223 (talk) 13:13, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have no complaints about your editing. However, no source exists to prove that PAA is "Syncretic"; it should be removed from infoobox. ProKMT (talk) 07:52, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]