This is an archive of past discussions about OnlyFans. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Due to xwiki abuse, and close to zero useful links, this domain has been globally blacklisted. If additions or changes are being blocked, then users should request either temporary whitelisting or a permanently whitelisted version of an acceptable url. mediawiki talk:spam-whitelist — billinghurstsDrewth00:22, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Bad sources?
The line "The company has been criticised by online media, including Gay Community News, for its content-sharing policies, and for content some users find offensive" doesn't seem to be supported by any of the two sources provided. One of them is about online sharing in general with OnlyFans only getting a namedrop (and is not actually criticized), and the other seems to be praising the site with a few minor mentions of some problems like load times and unclear policies. There is one line about online piracy, but that isn't the site's doing or specific to it, and the article doesn't imply that it is either. It was added by a redlinked user right at the beginning and no one has been able to provide a satisfactory source for it (the only other one that had been removed is a Youtube video by a user who pretty much just said that he wasn't thinking straight when he posted there.). I'm hitting it with a citation needed tag, though honestly that line probably should be taken off altogether if not even one source can be found it back up a statement that implies that it's being widely criticized online. 2409:4042:2E9F:9C5F:E80E:82E5:A988:5C1A (talk) 20:54, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions about OnlyFans. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
