Talk:OSCA MT4

Automobiles Low‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Motorsport

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Motorsport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Motorsport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MotorsportWikipedia:WikiProject MotorsportTemplate:WikiProject Motorsportmotorsport
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 7 January 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved due to COMMONNAME (non-admin closure) >>> Extorc.talk 20:13, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

O.S.C.A. MT-4 → OSCA MT4 – Simplified version of the name as per common usage. Nearly all motorsports entries in WP style the company name OSCA. Article uses "MT4" rather than MT-4 throughout, as does the German entry and Italian article. "Osca" is unsuitable since it is an acronym after all. In older sources, I also see MT 4 used with some frequency. There is no single right answer (although "MT-4" feels inappropriate, so I think the most elegant and easy to type version should win out. Mr.choppers | ✎ 19:29, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. In case it comes up (since the parent article is O.S.C.A.) I would also support moving this to O.S.C.A. MT4 as a second choice. A7V2 (talk) 02:37, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom (and also support A7V2's suggested second choice). DH85868993 (talk) 03:46, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.