Talk:Ña (Indic)
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:Nya (Indic))
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ña (Indic) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
malayalam jña
[edit]the image used for the malayalam jña ligature both here and on the ja (indic) page show the ligature for ñja instead Filipinojalapeno (talk) 20:10, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Requested move 2 January 2025
[edit]
![]() | It has been proposed in this section that Ña (Indic) be renamed and moved to Ña. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Ña (Indic) → Ña – Per WP:OVERPRECISION. I'm wondering why they didn't move it yet. 143.179.74.165 (talk) 11:31, 2 January 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 11:54, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support unless there are other uses that use this particular diacritic. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:00, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- I don't see any other uses for plain Ña than this. Even if there are, they probably don't deserve an article on Wikipedia. 143.179.74.165 (talk) 09:42, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose as per WP:Naming conventions (writing systems)#Glyphs and other elements. Wikiproject naming conventions are explicitly called out as exceptions at WP:OVERPRECISION, and this renaming would break the consistent naming of articles on the interrelated glyphs in Brahmic scripts. VanIsaac, GHTV contrabout 20:17, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose per VanIsaac. The standalone Ña, which is currently a redlink, as seen in the nomination, should redirect to either Ña (Indic) or to the Na disambiguation page, but Ña (Indic) should retain the parenthetical qualifier, analogous to Na (Indic), which currently has no hatnote, but needs one that points to Ña (Indic). It may be also noted that this entry was created in November 2015 as Nya (Indic), but was unilaterally moved in March 2018 to its current header, Ña (Indic). If a nomination were to be submitted for restoring the original Nya (Indic) header, I would support such a proposal. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 07:59, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- FYI, the move from Nya regularized the set of Category:Indic letters to names based on IAST romanization, which is the ISO recognized transliteration standard for Indic scripts. Cf. Ṅa (Indic) being moved from Nga (Indic) at the same time. VanIsaac, GHTV contrabout 05:54, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Disambiguation without a base title. No opinion on reverting to Nya (Indic). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:31, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class India articles
- Low-importance India articles
- Start-Class India articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject India articles
- Start-Class South Asia articles
- Low-importance South Asia articles
- South Asia articles
- Start-Class Southeast Asia articles
- Low-importance Southeast Asia articles
- WikiProject Southeast Asia articles
- Start-Class Writing system articles
- Low-importance Writing system articles
- Requested moves