Talk:Ngô Đình Nhu

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of Interfaith work group, a work group which is currently considered to be inactive.

Southeast Asia Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Southeast Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Southeast Asia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Southeast AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Southeast AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Southeast AsiaSoutheast Asia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Vietnam Low‑importance

	Vietnam portal This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Buddhism Low‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Ngô Đình Nhu appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 February 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Ngo Dinh Nhu (pictured right), a Hitler admirer, younger brother and chief adviser to President Diem of South Vietnam, tried to assassinate Sihanouk of Cambodia and publicly vowed to kill his father-in-law?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2010/February.

Wikipedia

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on August 31, 2010, August 31, 2011, August 31, 2014, August 31, 2019, and August 31, 2022.

Disputed Point

WTF? Where's the discussion on the disputed point? Otherwise it's not disputed. ABart26 13:48, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Citiations?

Olson is listed as a source in the notes, but his book isn't in the list of references. I'm just curious what book it is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.167.252.202 (talk) 22:23, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hardly a neo-Nazi

He was an admirer of Hitler, and he collected Nazi paraphernalia. Neither of these make him either a Nazi or a neo-Nazi. In fact, the article gives the impression that he was not a person with any ideological foundation whatsoever, merely a megalomaniacal, bloody despot. Unless some backing can be shown for an assertion that he deserves the Nazi label, I'll remove the Neo-Nazi category shortly. __meco (talk) 12:32, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes remove it. Hardly anyone in Vietnam think of Ngo Dinh Nhu as a neo-Nazi.Tryst Nguyen (talk) 12:42, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Ngo Dinh Nhu

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Ngo Dinh Nhu's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "encyc":

From Ton That Dinh: Tucker, pp. 288–289.
From 1962 South Vietnamese Independence Palace bombing: Tucker, p. 302.
From Pham Ngoc Thao: Tucker, Spencer C. (2000). Encyclopedia of the Vietnam War. ABC-CLIO. p. 325. ISBN 1-57607-040-0. {{cite book}}: Check |isbn= value: checksum (help)
From Nguyen Van Nhung: Tucker, p. 227.
From Le Quang Tung: Tucker, Spencer C. (2000). Encyclopedia of the Vietnam War. ABC-CLIO. p. 227. ISBN 1-57607-040-0. {{cite book}}: Check |isbn= value: checksum (help)

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:21, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Conflicting statement about burial

These statements seem to conflict. "The two brothers (Nhu and Diệm) were buried by the junta in a location that remains unknown ... there are also reports of cremation." vs "The two brothers are reburied in a cemetery in Lai Thieu." I suppose it is possible that someone who knew the secret location reburied them in Lai Thieu without revealing the temporary grave; but that seems very unlikely. Rather I suppose that the Lai Thieu graves are empty. Can someone clarify? Jmchutchinson (talk) 07:32, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

License of Covan ngodinhnhu.jpg

File:Covan ngodinhnhu.jpg

Covan ngodinhnhu,jpg

A few months ago I added the file 'Covan ngodinhnhu.jpg' as the main infobox image, it was and still is under the license CC-BY-SA-4.0 and the description said that it was the author's own work which i was sceptical of. A month later the infobox image was changed to the file 'Photo of Ngô Đình Nhu.jpg' by another editor which was deleted by Filedelinkerbot as the image lacked copyright and licensing. I would like to re-add Covan ngodinhnhu.jpg, however it still lacks any sort of reliable license, is there any way one can find out if there is an actual license or not? As I would not want to add a copyrighted image. Lochglasgowstrathyre (talk) 19:56, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It most definitely is not by the uploader, see their upload log which includes a pic of General Macarthur from the 19th century as 'own work' Bumbubookworm (talk) 20:50, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]