Talk:New Zealand Defence Force

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the New Zealand Defence Force article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: National / South Pacific Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	National militaries task force
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force

New Zealand High‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Foreign defence relations

This section needs updating. Adding the signing of the Wellington and Washington Declarations (2010-2012). Returning to formal military relations and resumed normal activities, Including NZDF/US Exercises ie; Rimpac, and even inviting the US Southern Katipo and Alam Halfia etc. It was decided after the US watched how New Zealand responded to various incidents, Boungvillie, East Timor and New Zealand's actions in Afganistan etc to just work together and work around our differences.

2016 USS Sampson visited for the RNZN 75th anniversary, although diverted to help with the Kaikoura earthquake. NZDF has been fully at RimPac since 2012, and been involved in other training exercises in the US. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2406:5A00:D8C4:6800:A04A:BA88:DFE9:D419 (talk) 02:50, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:NZLAV.jpg

The image Image:NZLAV.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

File:New Zealand soldiers in Iraq, March, 2004.jpg

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --00:52, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Soldiers

Foreign personnel. http://www.army.mil.nz/careers/overseas-applicants/default.htm --Conor Fallon (talk) 23:55, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you actually see this as important enough? BlakJakNZ (talk) 20:17, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated Page

This page is completely outdated. It claims that the New Zealand National party is the "main opposition" of the government. I suggest it be updated, considering the National Party is now in power. DonutGuy (talk) 20:41, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Organisation History

Would it be better to keep this under this article or separate it into its own? What are peoples thoughts? NealeFamily (talk) 07:33, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'd suggest a new article Nick-D (talk) 10:24, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nzairforce.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Nzairforce.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:37, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on New Zealand Defence Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:15, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on New Zealand Defence Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive to http://www.stuff.co.nz/thepress/3995638a13135.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:09, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on New Zealand Defence Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130729083853/http://www.national.org.nz/Article.aspx?ArticleId=4873 to http://www.national.org.nz/Article.aspx?ArticleId=4873

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:37, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Updated spending & troop numbers (October 2018)

This page could do with a lot more love. For now I've updated what was the very out of date defence spending and troop numbers, but a look-over for the page in general from experienced Wikipedians would be awesome. — Expansewalker (talk) 14:13, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New Logo?

With the release of the annual report for 2018 I was hoping to hear from other users about updating the current tri-service logo to a higher res image or possibly the newer logo featured on the report cover as seen here.

A Samoan news site has a well detailed Defence Force logo which includes the coat of arms and correct image type with .png transparency, see here. It lacks the tri-service logos underneath but as the page is focused on the Defence Force as a whole I think a larger/high-res coat of arms with relevant text would be more suitable. And of course the NZ Defence website as well as many recent documents are utilizing the ubiquitous kiwi logo which has both white and black variants, white one featured here. I would welcome any discussion on this. —Expansewalker (talk) 14:46, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Little no longer the current defence minister?

Andrew is nonincumbent. Who is the current defence minister? Winston Peters!? 125.238.84.60 (talk) 09:47, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A new government has yet to be formed. Until then, and without any unusualities, I imagine Little will remain Minister of Defence. Feel free to update this page and that one when you hear the new announcements. — HTGS (talk) 05:43, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]