Talk:New York Tribune Building/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 23:29, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:29, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Basic stuff and comments

• Infobox and lead look good. I also couldn't find any issues with #Site.
• "second through fourth, and the fifth through seventh floors" → "second through seventh floors"
  • I clarified this - the 2nd through 4th floors were one group, and the 5th through 7th floors were a second group. Epicgenius (talk) 15:32, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
• "an copper rail" → "a copper rail"
  • Done.
• Remove the comma after "designed to be fireproof".
  • Done.
• "earning annual income" → "earning an annual income"
  • Done.
• A period is not necessary in the caption in #Later_use_and_demolition.
  • Removed.
• "archaelogists" → "archaeologists" (MOS:SIC; silent correction)
  • The original wording was actually "archaeologists" with the "ae" as one ligature. I have fixed that. Epicgenius (talk) 15:32, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
• Check for ordering issues. Example: cite instead of
  • Done.
• Wikilink Christopher Gray (#11 and #85).
  • Done.
• Mark references from The New York Times with "|url-access=limited".
  • Done.

Progress

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

@Some Dude From North Carolina: Thanks for the review. I have addressed all the issues. Epicgenius (talk) 15:35, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.