Talk:Mystery Date (Mad Men)

Mystery Date (Mad Men) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 22, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mystery Date (Mad Men)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 14:50, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Title: The "Mad Men" part of the title needs to be italicized
Intro: References aren't needed in the lead, so I'd move [1] and [2] down into the meat of the article
Intro: Change "can't" to 'can not'
Production: Maybe say who wrote and directed before jumping right into the section
Production: Explain what a Clio Award is/Is Writing Pad a reputable source? If so, what is it?
References: "down only .1 point from "Tea Leaves"" put a 0 before .1
Reception: "The episode received rave reviews from many publications, though some were mixed on the value of the dream sequence." I would change the wording, as a rave review means that it was mostly positive, which doesn't meld with the mixed reception of the dream

Those are the only issues I spot. On hold for seven days.--Gen. Quon (talk) 20:44, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Problems have been sufficiently resolved. Passing.--Gen. Quon (talk) 18:25, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A Note Concerning an External Link

I am writing about an addition I made to the external links for Season 4 and Season 5 of Mad Men which was automatically reverted by your bot. These links are from Kritik, the official weblog of the Unit for Criticism & Interpretive Theory, a recognized institute for cultural studies at the University of Illinois. The Unit for Criticism's multi-authored series of posts on Season 4 and Season 5 of Mad Men is the offshoot of a series of events including a symposium and Duke University Press book on the same topic. Each blog is authored by a recognized expert in cultural history, media studies and/or literary studies. Please do not remove this link as it does comply with Wikipedia policy and guidelines. We would be delighted to answer any questions you may have. 192.17.134.9 (talk) 19:36, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am writing about the addition above that was reverted again. We are not in violation of copyright issues. Please send us any questions you may have about the links we are making to the official weblog Kritik.128.174.194.84 (talk) 21:18, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]