Talk:Monstress (comics)
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Aayala19.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:11, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit] This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 January 2019 and 15 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Masonbissada. Peer reviewers: KassideSE, Eyebasooda, Jahh21.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:11, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Potential sources for improvement
[edit]- https://www.syfy.com/syfywire/5-image-comics-series-that-should-be-adapted-for-tv
- https://www.gqindia.com/content/graphic-novel-will-make-feminist/
- https://www.star2.com/culture/2018/08/28/marjorie-liu-sana-takeda-monstress/
- http://www.comicsbeat.com/monstress-wins-a-hugo-award-and-sana-takeda-wins-a-second-one/
- https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/comic-riffs/wp/2018/08/20/monstress-leads-womens-domination-of-the-2018-hugo-awards/
- https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2017/09/marjorie-liu-monstress-interview/539394/
- https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/monstress-marjorie-liu-first-woman-comic-book-award_us_5b563e17e4b0b15aba91888a
- https://www.complex.com/pop-culture/2018/08/20-image-comics-you-should-be-reading/
- http://www.vulture.com/2016/07/why-the-bloody-comic-monstress-forgoes-men.html
- https://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2016/07/monstress-review.html
- https://www.npr.org/2016/08/02/487633169/good-evil-and-long-black-tentacles-make-a-monstress
- https://www.barnesandnoble.com/blog/sci-fi-fantasy/marjorie-liu-sana-takeda-discuss-monstress-collaboration/
- https://www.guernicamag.com/making-a-monstress/
- https://www.hypable.com/marjorie-liu-monstress-interview/
- https://www.npr.org/2016/07/22/487078939/graphic-novelist-marjorie-lui-on-how-rejection-shaped-her-writing
- https://www.cbr.com/liu-takedas-monstress-is-about-every-moment-a-woman-says-enough/
- https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/awakening-monstress-within/
- https://comicbook.com/2015/10/05/exclusive-interview-sana-takeda-discusses-monstress/
- http://sktchd.com/art-feature/sana-takeda-on-the-beauty-and-darkness-of-monstress/
- https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/monsters-come-home-marjorie-liu-sana-takedas-monstress/
- https://comicbookroundup.com/comic-books/reviews/image-comics/monstress/1
Peer Review Josh
[edit]1. First, what does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way? I get a full picture of the comic in a nice, concise form. Well done. 2. What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement? I would flesh out the lead a bit more. One more sentence might help draw the reader in. 3. What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? You could create a section about the social messaging Liu conveys -- it seems important. 4. Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Not exactly, but I want to tell you that I now want to read this comic. Sounds awesome. Josh Jahh21 (talk) 16:22, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Not GA readey
[edit]@Masonbissada: I appreciate your enthusiasm, but this article isn't yet up to the Good article criteria. In addition to flimsy publication history and reception sections, it contains weasel words (I've marked one example) and some sources are not properly formatted (#1 is a bare url). I recommend reviewing any of the entries under the "comics" header at Wikipedia:Good articles/Language and literature to get an idea of what GA status articles look like. Specific examples include The Accelerators (comics), Motor Girl, and Rachel Rising. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me here or at my talk page. Argento Surfer (talk) 16:49, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Argento Surfer - Masonbissada hasn't returned since the 13th, so I'm going to remove the GA nomination for them. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 13:36, 17 May 2019 (UTC)