Talk:Missouri Route 48/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kees08 (talk · contribs) 07:02, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Pending
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	~~Maybe wikilink Route sooner?~~ No, that's the first time supplemental routes are mentioned.Nova Crystallis (Talk) ~~Link Rosendale, US 71, King City, US 169, Gentry County (in body of article)~~ Done.Nova Crystallis (Talk)
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	Earwig is good, will check the PDFs when I go through them.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Color me surprised, it is stable!
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Tineye says the wiki version is the first version it found, rationales seem reasonable.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.

~~Large Expense~~

~~Flood 1 Flood 2, maybe mention them if notable?~~

Added the first one, only significant floods are notable.

Sounds good. Kees08 (Talk)

~~Either in the caption or the body mention that the octoganol house is on the National Register.~~

Added.

~~Can we get some of the dollar amounts adjusted for inflation?~~

Done.