Talk:Melina Perez

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Melina Perez article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 3 months

Melina Perez has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Melina Perez is part of the MNM series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 17, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed
July 27, 2009	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Professional wrestling Mid‑importance

	Melina Perez is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mexico Low‑importance

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's sport: Martial arts Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Women's martial arts task force.

Duplicate info on modeling career

The second piece in her main bio and the "Modeling Career" section opener are exactly the same sentence except for one word, including using the same unreliable link. It's redundant, one of the two sections should be pruned. Any opinions as to which should go? Wanted to ask before removing.JamesG5 (talk) 15:50, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say the first mentioning (in the lead) should go. Nikki♥311 19:35, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Melina Perez. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:27, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

UPW

Why is Melina's whole time spent with UPW not mentioned at all??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrissbergstrom (talk • contribs) 22:29, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Melina Perez. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:23, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Melina Perez. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090109002836/http://www.wrestlezone.com/article.php?articleid=214382253 to http://www.wrestlezone.com/article.php?articleid=214382253

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:57, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

HHH Pedigree / 2020 contract

Please refrain from edit warring and engaging in page ownership behavior. Clearly multiple other editors disagree with the reliability of the source. Right now you are insisting that the page reflect your subjective opinion that this particular person is lying simply because others have lied about similar subjects in the past. It is not important that the page reflect that a gossip site reported something. You cannot state as fact second-hand anonymous information. PWInsider is not a primary source. This can wait until confirmation by a primary source, if even such confirmation ever comes. UniNoUta (talk) 16:42, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indepdendent sources 101. Examples of no independent sources. "You're writing about… a person" "Independent News media, popular or scholarly book" "Non-independent Person, family members, friends, employer, employees". Again, PWInsider is a reliable sources, known for fact checking. After talking with several sources, they confirmed Melina signed with WWE. It's reliable and did their job. It's not a "we hear something" or "Melina is in talks with WWE". It's proved in the past, when they confirmed Morrison contract with WWE. Melina isn't independent about this information, since she is too involved with the news. In this case, Melisa isn't independent about the subject, she and the promotion are involved and have an interest ( a big surprise). PWInsider is not a primary source, but that's why Wikipedia uses secondary, independent sources. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 16:55, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PWInsider is reliable. For example, they confirmed Sarah Stock was fired from WWE, even when WWE didn't confirm the information. Why PWInsider is reliable for a released wrestler but not for a hired wrestler? --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 17:00, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Because a site was correct about one thing in the past does not mean they are automatically correct about all other things in the future. They are, in fact, incorrect about many things. Just as a recent example: in March of this year they reported that Nia Jax would be returning from injury and going to the Smackdown brand. Six months later and she's still not. Now are we to assume that because they were wrong about one thing they must be wrong about everything? No. But anonymous third-party reports cannot be taken as fact until they are confirmed. Thus far, it is only your opinion that PW Insider has "confirmed" this. Wikipedia is not for opinions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by UniNoUta (talk • contribs) 17:25, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not my opinion, PWInsider words. These are no anonymous third party reports. PWInsider has an staff that confirm the information with several other sources, trusted by the staff. That's journalism. If several trusted sources by the Insider are questioned and they agree, that's journalism. You are the one who thinks PWInsider is not reliable based on your opinion or because the all might WWE doesn't confirm, even when Melina and WWE aren't independent to the subject. It' not the same as the Nia Jax, since they're reporting furute plans for her, not facts. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 17:52, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]