This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia
I have written the first draft of this article, because "Media Deconvergence" is now a term that appear more and more often in academic research, yet when entered in a Google search, this is aumatically corrected into "Media Convergence". The same entry about technical convergence in wikipedia, under the section of "media", reveals that the understanding of media convergence has changed: there is an old understanding and a new understanding. The notion of media deconvergence helps understanding what is 'new' in the current version. As a researcher of social science specialised in media and communications, I would like to disclose a COI: I have also written about media convergence and deconvergence, hence, partly, I used here also my own references. The article linked in available as open source. Dr.sergio.rs (talk) 17:00, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
