This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Family and relationships, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Family and relationshipsWikipedia:WikiProject Family and relationshipsTemplate:WikiProject Family and relationshipsFamily and relationships articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Looking at this article, it quite literally has no sources and seems to be a list of links follows by brief summaries or other articles. Perhaps a merge or complete delete would be in order?174.131.56.114 (talk) 04:14, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This article seems redundant, as more detailed and relevant information can be seen on both the Human mating strategies and Mating systems pages. The article contains only a cursory overview of some arbitrary aspects of human mating, most of which is not cited - the article has only one source relating to flirting. The article is merely brief summaries of areas which are all covered in sufficient depth on their own article pages, and therefore seems unnecessary. Sarikauppal95 (talk) 14:38, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]