Talk:Marine Life Protection Act

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fisheries and Fishing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fisheries and Fishing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fisheries, aquaculture and fishing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fisheries and FishingWikipedia:WikiProject Fisheries and FishingTemplate:WikiProject Fisheries and FishingFishing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 11 January 2021 and 14 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Devonstapleton.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:34, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Rachelmorales.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:24, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Marine Life Protection Act. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130324010038/http://www.caloceans.org/ to http://www.caloceans.org/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090329113346/http://www.yesfishing.org/ to http://www.yesfishing.org/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120619171009/http://www.somethingsfishyaboutpso.com/ to http://www.somethingsfishyaboutpso.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:08, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Marine Life Protection Act. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:17, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Policy Analysis

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 March 2022 and 30 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): ALRueger, Spacepiece, K1carter (article contribs).

Critique on Article: Initial Recommendations

Content

It seems that a large amount of content was added to this article but never completed. Multiple sections of the text are either missing references entirely or are cited to dead links. Current content additions are needed. Grammatical errors need to be edited as well, although this is not a major problem. A gossipy tone permeates the article which points to biased content.

Lawsuits Section

This section is disruptive and confusing as it is overly detailed and biased in tone. No citations are listed in this section of multiple paragraphs. This section needs to be fact-checked, rewritten, and citations added.

References Section

References with correct and live links are numbers 1,3,4,6,7,8,9,11,15,16, and 21. As such, the article contains multiple inline references to bad links that should be either removed or edited. Many links seem outdated as well as multiple links resulting in 404 error messages, or are legacy links found via the Wayback Machine in need of an update. Some links are to blog articles that are not appropriate or reliable sources per Wikipedia rules and as such should be omitted.

External References Section

This section is unusable and must be updated in its entirety. There are multiple bad links with 404 error messages, outdated legacy links, and other links that need to be either updated or omitted.

Plagiarism

Close paraphrasing is not apparent, but further investigation through comparisons to verifiable, nonbiased sources is required during content review and reference link updating to clearly understand the extent of plagiarism in this article.

--Spacepiece (talk) 20:33, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

More sections?

I think there should always be sections that can give insight on improvement and there are plenty of articles about what it would take to do that in different categories. I have one on fishery spaces and how making sure spacing is prioritized, but also thtat the spaces have actions to make sure they stay protected. https://nyaspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/nyas.14651 — Preceding unsigned comment added by K1carter (talk • contribs) 23:25, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lead Section

The introduction or lead section of the article is somewhat sparse in providing an explanation of the distinguishing features of the Marine Life Protection Act and its plans to address the shortcomings of previously established Marine Protected Areas in California. --ALRueger (talk) 02:54, 26 April 2022 (UTC)ALRueger[reply]

MLPA Implementation Section

There are multiple instances of missing citations in this section. Especially noticeable lack of citations are found towards the end of the Marine Life Protection Act Implementation section, where a lot of information is provided about specific events and data that have no supporting peer reviewed publications to verify their credibility.--ALRueger (talk) 02:55, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Science Section

This section of the article is where I expected to see the utilization of a lot more research. This would improve the overall credibility and support the need for the Marine Life Protection Act. Additionally, the sources being used are now outdated and more recent scientific evidence is necessary. --ALRueger (talk) 02:58, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]