Talk:OneMK

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buckinghamshire, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BuckinghamshireWikipedia:WikiProject BuckinghamshireTemplate:WikiProject BuckinghamshireBuckinghamshire

Newspapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

MKweb

As MKweb is a separate company in the Illiffe group, surely it should have its own page? If no-one objects, I shall propose a split. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 20:03, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bias

Paragraph 3 starts with "Our proposal included.." suggesting this is cut from a press release or otherwise written by someone with a heavy bias. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.140.55.191 (talk) 18:17, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have edied the MKweb material heavily to delete the weasel words and puffery. As noted next, I have split off the MKwem material into its own article, see MKWeb. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 01:34, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MKWem material split from MK News into its own article.

Split to

Text and/or other creative content from this version of MK News was copied or moved into MKWeb with this edit on 20122302. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

I have split the MKWeb content from MK News since it is a separate division of Iliffe News and Media and is not operated by MK News. See talk above --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 01:36, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Recombine

I have renamed the former MKNews article as OneMK to reflect the change of name. I have also reinstated the onemk.co.uk website as part of this article, since it no longer appears to be a separate business. The article MKWeb continues to exist, for archival and continuity purposes. It has a note to say it is obsolete and advising users of this page. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 20:53, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If anyone from onemk online is watching, please be advised that your redirection of links to MKweb to the correspond onemk page is not working properly - you aren't handling URLs that begin http:// correctly. Many facts on Wikipedia relating to MK are supported by citations to mkweb, for example this from Newton Longville:

However, by March 2013 the developers' consortium had begun consulting with nearby parish councils with a view to submitting a new planning application for a development fully to the north of the railway line.^[1]

and so will fail. You may wish to repair.--John Maynard Friedman (talk) 20:53, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ "Salden Chase plans are back on the table". MK News. Local World. 10 April 2013.

[1] "Salden Chase plans are back on the table". MK News. Local World. 10 April 2013.

[1]