Jump to content

Talk:List of Michelin-starred restaurants in the Netherlands

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Tables

[edit]

Should the tables be sortable by the year columns? Not sure this works/helps. Rich Farmbrough, 23:02, 16 August 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Rendering time etc.

[edit]
Moved from Signpost talk
Rich Farmbrough, 20:49, 21 August 2011 (UTC).[reply]

I still have trouble with "my" article List of Michelin starred restaurants in the Netherlands. If I change anything and try to save it, it ends up as a Wikimedia error. But if I open the article in another window, the edit has gone through. Not a clue what causes this. It is a 74Kb article, not too big as far as I know. Night of the Big Wind talk 10:27, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What browser are you using? WP:VPT is your best place to file a detailed report. - Jarry1250 [Weasel? Discuss.] 11:13, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Firefox 5.0 on Windows Vista. Night of the Big Wind talk 11:53, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
What specifically is the error message? -- John Broughton (♫♫) 12:15, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I get the following error message:
Our servers are currently experiencing a technical problem. This is probably temporary and should be
fixed soon. Please try again in a few minutes.
You may be able to get further information in the #wikipedia channel on the Freenode IRC network.
The Wikimedia Foundation is a non-profit organisation which hosts some of the most popular sites on 
the Internet, including Wikipedia. It has a constant need to purchase new hardware. If you would 
like to help, please donate.
If you report this error to the Wikimedia System Administrators, please include the details below.
Request: POST http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Michelin_starred_restaurants_in_the_Netherlands&action=submit,
from 91.198.174.33 via sq75.wikimedia.org (squid/2.7.STABLE9) to 10.2.1.1 (10.2.1.1)
Error: ERR_READ_TIMEOUT, errno [No Error] at Tue, 16 Aug 2011 12:54:06 GMT }}

Night of the Big Wind talk 12:56, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I get that from time to time. But just muddle through... Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:17, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
At a guess it is because of the large number of templates on the page, I get the same problem on pages with a large number of {{coord}} templates on it. Keith D (talk) 19:32, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The stars images expand to 3 images per year per restaurant. There are probably better 1,2,3 of 3 star images you could use (they certainly exist for "n of 5" and "n of 10" stars). This would cut the size of the HTML by almost 2/3, and the page would not then take 18 seconds to serve. Rich Farmbrough, 21:50, 16 August 2011 (UTC).[reply]
PrimeHunter has made a good start to fixing this through template magic. Rich Farmbrough, 21:56, 16 August 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Images used as described, page now served faster and is much smaller :). Rich Farmbrough, 23:00, 16 August 2011 (UTC).[reply]
I have replaced the star-template by one stolen from the Dutch WP newly built. It makes the article bigger, but I have the idea that it loads much quicker. Can somebody test that? Night of the Big Wind talk 21:39, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Serving time is labelled as fast, but it appeared to load much slower, presumably due to the size. The fix by Primehunter means that no parameters are used and the rendering engine can cache the rendered templates instead of having to re-compute them every time. The fix by me reduced the number of images on the page by about 1/3, which massively reduces the number of images on the page. Your version goes part way, since it doesn't represent the missing stars, but 2 stars are still 2 images - clearly if people are not aware that it is a 3-star system (as I wasn't for some time) this information is lost. You can re-introduce these benefits by creating or finding 2 and 3 star Michelin images and either calling your new template through three wrappers, or splitting it into three, this sill retains your star-sortability, however cunningly chosen image-names probably do this too. There may be other optimisations. You should also consider the accessibility issues of filling a table with stars. Rich Farmbrough, 20:49, 21 August 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Using newly acquiered knowledge I have created three new images of Michelin stars. The are now three jpg'sGIF's representing one, two or three stars. So every template has to load just one picure. Hope this works better. Night of the Big Wind talk 15:43, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on List of Michelin starred restaurants in the Netherlands. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:32, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of Michelin starred restaurants in the Netherlands. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:31, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Michelin starred restaurants in the Netherlands. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:10, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chronological order

[edit]

What's the issue with reversing the order? It makes sense to have the current first rather than scrolling to the end. Also, no editor need permission to make changes, and changes do NOT need to be discussed first, per BRD. Spleodrach (talk) 09:06, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And why would you change that order? Just to make a point? The Banner talk 09:54, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You should assume good faith. I edit articles in order to improve. I think readers would like to see the current Michelin starred restaurants first, not a table mostly long closed restaurants from the 1950s/60s. If they want to see the history, then scroll down. The current table should be first like the lead/intro in an article, then the detailed history follows on from that. Spleodrach (talk) 17:48, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"You should assume good faith." Good idea, I hoop to see that from you too. The Banner talk 22:58, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that the most recent information makes sense to be at the top which is consistent with other Michelin-starred pages. I'll post this on the Michelin task force page and get consensus and add to the style guide. Expandinglight5 (talk) 18:42, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Consensus has been reached. Reverse chronological is in sync with other Michelin pages. Main page updated. Expandinglight5 (talk) 06:48, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Add A Fact: "De Librije sole Dutch three-star restaurant"

[edit]

I found a fact that might belong in this article. See the quote below

De Librije nu enige Nederlandse restaurant met drie sterren

The fact comes from the following source:

https://nos.nl/artikel/2539927-de-librije-nu-enige-nederlandse-restaurant-met-drie-sterren

Here is a wikitext snippet to use as a reference: 

 {{Cite web |title=De Librije nu enige Nederlandse restaurant met drie sterren |url=https://nos.nl/artikel/2539927-de-librije-nu-enige-nederlandse-restaurant-met-drie-sterren |website=nos.nl |date=2024-10-07 |access-date=2024-10-07 |language=nl |quote=De Librije nu enige Nederlandse restaurant met drie sterren}}

This post was generated using the Add A Fact browser extension.

Zoeperkoe (talk) 14:33, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_Michelin-starred_restaurants_in_the_Netherlands&oldid=1260261162"