This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
I placed the "LGBT" after the African-American making the article's title "List of African American LGBT" I placed the LGBT in front in order to be consistent with this article African-American LGBT community which I consider to be its parent. Should the "LGBT" be in back making the title "List of LGBT African American"
Freethemindfull (talk) 03:57, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Because it's a list of people and we don't call people LGBTs. We do call them African Americans. LGBT is only going to work as an adjective, modifying the plural noun. It's really the same logic as to why we have a List of LGBT Jews and not a List of Jewish LGBT. So really it's grammar rather than our naming policy -- my mistake there. But if you still disagree I won't move it. Someone else might though. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:32, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
