Talk:Law of equal liberty

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Anarchism

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anarchism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anarchism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnarchismWikipedia:WikiProject AnarchismTemplate:WikiProject Anarchismanarchism articles

Anarchism WikiProject open tasks
watch · edit · history · talk · purge

Recognized content · Drafts & requests · Subscribe · Member list · Resources · How can I help?

Did you know

27 Nov 2024 – Los Justicieros (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Grnrchst (t · c); see discussion
19 Nov 2024 – Anarchism without adjectives (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Grnrchst (t · c); see discussion
15 Nov 2024 – Fagoppositionens Sammenslutning (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Grnrchst (t · c); see discussion
05 Nov 2024 – 1931 Barcelona rent strike (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Launchballer (t · c); see discussion
25 Oct 2024 – Voltairine de Cleyre (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Grnrchst (t · c); see discussion

Good article nominees

28 Nov 2024 – Alt Llobregat insurrection (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Grnrchst (t · c); start discussion
22 Nov 2024 – Los Justicieros (talk · edit · hist) GA nominated by Grnrchst (t · c) was promoted by Spookyaki (t · c), see discussion

Peer reviews

26 Oct 2024 – Lucy Parsons (talk · edit · hist) has been put up for PR by Mujinga (t · c); see discussion

Cleanup (0) · Potentially related articles · Recent edits · Recent Commons images · Stub expansion project (515)

Politics: Libertarianism Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Libertarianism portal This article is supported by WikiProject Libertarianism (assessed as Low-importance).

2010 comment

This page is titled law of equal liberty defined by Spencer. However, a search of Social Statics reveals numerous uses of law of equal freedom, but not a single use of equal liberty. Should/could this page be renamed law of equal freedom, which is the doctrine named by Spencer? Also his quotes have minor errors which need correction.SpaceSailor 22:02, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

I concur that the original discussion refers to the law of equal freedom. For example, see the citation discussing Spencer and George. ^[1] A simple solution would be to create a page for law of equal freedom and direct it to this one or vice versa, direct this to the new one. --Skywalker8 (talk) 08:45, 20 March 2019 (UTC)Skywalker8, 2019[reply]

References

^ Herbert Spencer, Henry George, and the Land Question https://www.libertarianism.org/publications/essays/excursions/herbert-spencer-henry-george-land-question-part-1

Equality of Opportunity

If we were all equal then we would all have the same ability to run, speak and claim the same number of children as being ours. People are not equal and some are better equipped for life whilst others have disabilities. WHat we do need is EQUALITY OF OPPORTUNITY or an equal chance to find suitable work, food, shelter, education for our children and knowledge about how our social system works.Macrocompassion (talk) 07:32, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Libertarian liberalism is in no way socialism, folks

Spencer was in no way a socialist. Nor was Benj Tucker. You might include a ref to Josiah Warren, Equitable Commerce, etc. You might also refer to St George Tucker's discussion of this subject in his edition of Blackstone. You can consider these people anarchists in that they were opposed to the Whigs. But their principles of individual freedom are consider "far right" by today's socialists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.28.145.174 (talk) 21:42, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Without sources which explicitly support your claims, this is original research. warmly, ezlev. talk 21:44, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Herbert Spencer, Henry George, and the Land Question https://www.libertarianism.org/publications/essays/excursions/herbert-spencer-henry-george-land-question-part-1

[1]