Jump to content

Talk:Katia Elizarova

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Images

[edit]

Can anyone upload any images? Carpefemme (talk) 17:51, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Finding images for lesser known celebrities can be tough. With a quick search, I see no free images available.  Mbinebri  talk ← 19:38, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There's hundreds of images floating around out there, what do you mean by free images? If I knew how I'd upload them 00:30, 20 September 2011 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.86.229.119 (talk)
You can't just upload pictures. They have to adhere to copyright regulations as stated in the Wikipedia Policy and Copyright Laws. Most images on the internet is copyrighted.—cyberpower (Talk to Me)(Contributions) 23:06, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'll see about uploading images that are free use. There seem to be some available to download from events—Carpefemme (Talk to Me)(Contributions) 00:58, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

One Sided Story

[edit]

This biography is one sided. It only lists the positive aspects of this person rather than a complete detailed description of the person's lifetime. Someone should consider fixing this.—cyberpower (Talk to Me)(Contributions) 23:08, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's one-sided because the article is being used for promotion, and any attempt to change that (as I did earlier) or even point it out is met with questionable reverts and talk page hounding.  Mbinebri  talk ← 23:13, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like there is little negative information from reliable news sources on-line. Overall the article is equally as balanced as similar pages within the categories. Please add additional information if you find some.  Carpefemme  talk ← 00:52, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
What the heck? My signature styling has been stolen!  Mbinebri  talk ← 01:59, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Katia Elizarova Standing with Hat.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Katia Elizarova Standing with Hat.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Katia Elizarova Standing with Hat.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:02, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removing prohibited material

[edit]

Inclusion of "She has been linked to British actor Benedict Cumberbatch as well as an unnamed boyfriend." to Personal Life section which is not in accordance to the Biographies of Living People page.[[1]]. It is unnecessary, unverifiable, purely speculative and gossipy piece. Works cited are also contradictory of each other and from tabloids or gossip sections of newspapers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aikatastrophe (talkcontribs) 10:53, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agree to the deletion of gossipy and insignificant sentence to Elizarova's biography.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.191.45.91 (talk) 11:19, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you agree because you are the same editor. There are two references supporting the content, please explain why you believe these references are not reliable sources for the content. Flat Out let's discuss it 12:45, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Adding comment that source links provided don't confirm or deny any relationship. It is purely speculative. Speculations are insignificant and unecessary and should be removed in the section for only encylopedic content are included — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aikatastrophe (talkcontribs) 11:40, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I consider this the best version

Elizarova who is friends with Benedict Cumberbatch, has reportedly sought the actor's assistance for her theatrical debut this year saying, "I have just got my script and began rehearsals. Ben has been a great help, but he is very strict." She is said to have a boyfriend of four years who she lives with in London.

You added a reference and cherry-pickedd a quote from that source, but you also deleted the content that was supported by the other two sources. That is not constructive editing and it seems you are trying to censor the article.Flat Out let's discuss it 12:47, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

problems I have -the word "linked" is very ambigous. better specify their relationship than be open to misinterpretation -"unnamed" boyfriend is completely unnecessary. better to write "boyfriend" and the lenght of their relationship. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.191.45.91 (talk) 12:29, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please stick to one account to make your case here? See WP:SOCKPUPPET. Flat Out let's discuss it 12:45, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article protected

[edit]

This article has been protected from editing for three days to try to generate talk page discussion of the disputed content. Please follow the WP:BRD guideline. You may also wish to consider dispute resolution (WP:DR). Mark Arsten (talk) 17:07, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Now unprotected due to blocks. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:38, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Birth year

[edit]

The cite that said she was 27 is dated September 24, 2013, which would make her birth year 1986. However, if she turned 28 anytime between then and Dec. 31, 2013, it would make her birth year 1985. Since we don't have a cite for what day she was born, we can't say with certainty either 1985 or 1986. --Tenebrae (talk) 20:09, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As my good colleague User:Lady Lotus has pointed out, while The Times cite in the lead says only "27," the London Evening Standard cite specifies 1986. I compliment her good eye and have volunteered to do the grunt work on the edit! All good. --Tenebrae (talk) 22:22, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Lol you're so funny and thank you for doing the grunt work, you'll make it better anyway ;) Lady Lotustalk 22:58, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Katia Elizarova. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:43, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Katia Elizarova. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:04, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]