This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Running, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of running on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RunningWikipedia:WikiProject RunningTemplate:WikiProject RunningRunning
This article is within the scope of WikiProject St. Louis, a project to build and improve articles related to St. Louis and the surrounding metropolitan area. We invite you to join the project and contribute to the discussion.St. LouisWikipedia:WikiProject St. LouisTemplate:WikiProject St. LouisSt. Louis
"KangaROOS were considered the absolute ultimate in athletic footwear"
A little POV don't you think? --unsigned by 70.64.188.255 at 09:41, 20 March 2006
Why don't YOU write it then? --unsigned by User:Valor19 at 09:07, 21 March 2006.
The current spelling "KangaRoos" is obviously rubbish. It should either be "KangaROOS", like the company write themselves, or "Kangaroos" if you subscribe to the viewpoint that Wikipedia shouldn't adopt every strange spelling a company will invent for its brandname. I would change it to the oficial brand spelling if that page didn't already exist as a redirection here. (This might involve deletion first. I'm not sure about that.) --BjKa (talk) 16:33, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]