This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the KSI vs. Logan Paul article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
KSI vs. Logan Paul was a Sports and recreation good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Boxing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Boxing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BoxingWikipedia:WikiProject BoxingTemplate:WikiProject BoxingBoxing
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester
This article is within the scope of WikiProject YouTube, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of YouTube and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YouTubeWikipedia:WikiProject YouTubeTemplate:WikiProject YouTubeYouTube
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:
Why did somebody nominate this for deletion, saying until the discussion is closed? There is no discussion about this. Also, unblock me on Wikia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sockleet (talk • contribs) 11:19, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I think removing "meaning over 12 million dollars was lost in pay-per-view revenue." or changing it to something like "meaning over $12 million in potential pay-per-view revenue was not realized." would be an improvement. This addition isn't mentioned in the cited source and piracy doesn't equate 1:1 with lost revenue as implied here. Ouroborus777 (talk) 22:36, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Already done – Lead section of the article already mentions the upcoming rematch.–WPA (talk) 22:19, 7 September 2019 (UTC)