Jump to content

Talk:Intra-household bargaining

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[untitled section]

[edit]

I created this article because after reading much academic research on intra-household bargaining I realized that Wikipedia had virtually no information on the subject. The current Bargaining entry only discusses bargaining in strict economic terms and does not acknowledge its role in decision-making within households. Additionally, the Inequality of bargaining power entry does not address the inequality of bargaining power between men and women within a traditional household, which, according to Bina Agarwal, is a key feature in understanding intra-household bargaining (Agarwal, Bina. 1997. “’Bargaining’ and Gender Relations: Within and Beyond the Household.”). I hope this entry will raise awareness of the functioning of households and the unequal bargaining power individuals within the household can find themselves with. Please let me know if you have any suggestions for the page! Mfandersen (talk) 21:27, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for initiating this important and necessary dialogue on intra-household bargaining. Your insight into the current gaps in Wikipedia's representation of this topic is quite perceptive, and your efforts to amend this are highly commendable.
From the excerpt provided, it is evident that recent developments in economics, sociology, and related fields are advancing our understanding of intra-household dynamics, particularly in regards to labor division and marital stability. These developments are taking place in various dimensions, from an increase in female participation in the workforce to changing trends in marriage and divorce rates. Researchers are adopting various analytical tools and models - such as the New Home Economics tradition, altruist models, cooperative game models, and non-cooperative game models - to explore the intricate connections between female labor force participation rates, human capital investment, and marital stability.
These modern economic analyses seem to integrate various factors, including extrahousehold environmental parameters and the diverse nature of human capital, to offer nuanced insights into the negotiation positions within a household and how they influence the division of labor.
In light of this, your article could potentially serve as a rich and multifaceted resource on this topic, encompassing various theories and approaches to intra-household bargaining. Here are a few suggestions to consider:
Comprehensive Introduction: Ensure to have an inclusive introduction that not only defines intra-household bargaining but also traces its evolution in recent decades, particularly highlighting the role and increasing participation of women in the labor force.
Integration of Various Theories: You might want to delve deeply into the different economic theories and models that are being applied to study intra-household dynamics, explaining each one's perspective and the insights they offer into the changing family structure and labor division.
Case Studies and Real-Life Examples: Incorporate case studies or examples from various cultures and societies that have experienced noticeable shifts in intra-household dynamics, offering a practical perspective on the topic.
Legal and Societal Implications: Discuss the implications of these changing dynamics on legal systems and societal structures, offering readers insights into the broader impact of these shifts.
Connecting to Existing Literature: As you mentioned the works of Bina Agarwal, it would be a good idea to connect these newer developments and theories to existing literature, perhaps even critiquing or building upon them based on recent research findings. Qwerasdzxcjyx (talk) 22:50, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We need more important work as sources of information

[edit]

The creation of this wiki page is a good starting point to introduce intra-household bargaining in family economics. However, the heavy citation of works by the less-known economist Bina Agarwal seems to be inappropriate. Scholars such as Nobel Prize laureates Gary Becker and James Heckman have written on this topic a long time ago. We hope to see more relevant introductions on this topic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:EA00:104:400:2C75:D658:2FEE:FCB4 (talk) 19:22, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I removed {{onesource}} because half the articles cited are by other sources. Peaceray (talk) 00:26, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Psychology of Financial Planning II

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 August 2023 and 17 October 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Qwerasdzxcjyx (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Sqebo (talk) 20:37, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]