Talk:Interstate 235 (Iowa)

Interstate 235 (Iowa) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 5, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

U.S. Roads: Interstates / Iowa Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Topics

Interstate Highways

Locations

Iowa

This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.

This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Article recognition:

	This article was the selected article of the U.S. Roads Portal in July 2019.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Interstate 235 (Iowa)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: –Grondemar 17:36, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I made some copyedits to the article; beyond that, I can find no issues.

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
I am happy to pass GA for this article. Congratulations!

Thanks. –Grondemar 20:29, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I 235 Construction Controversy

I feel like it may be notable to add the development's effect on Af-Am neighborhoods in Des Moines. http://ir.uiowa.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1407&context=annals-of-iowa — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.228.164.10 (talk) 16:35, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Interstate 235 (Iowa). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110929182922/http://www.iowadot.gov/50thpages/pdf/interstatemap.pdf to http://www.iowadot.gov/50thpages/pdf/interstatemap.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:56, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]