Talk:InfoWars

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the InfoWars article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 30 days

view · edit

Frequently asked questions

Many of these questions arise frequently on the talk page concerning InfoWars and Alex Jones.

To view an explanation of the answer, click the [show] link to the right of the question.

Q1: Is this article biased?

A1: Wikipedia follows the consensus view of reliable independent sources. Sometimes, as with InfoWars, the dominant view is negative. Wikipedia avoids false balance and does not accord undue weight to fringe views.

Q2: Should the article describe InfoWars as "fake news"?

A2: Yes. There is clear consensus among reliable independent sources that InfoWars routinely publishes entirely fabricated stories, otherwise known as fake news.

Q3: Should the article describe InfoWars as far-right or alt-right?

A3: Both. There is clear consensus among reliable independent sources that InfoWars's political stance aligns with the far right and alt-right.

Q4: Should the article describe InfoWars as promoting conspiracy theories?

A4: Yes. There is clear consensus among reliable independent sources that InfoWars promotes conspiracies, most notably the false claim that the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting was a false-flag operation.

Q5: Does the number of editors who complain about bias on the talk page, or the frequency of complaints, matter?

A5: No. WP:CONSENSUS does not work that way. Please refer to Q1 for more information on the requirements for a post to merit consideration. It should cite reliable sources that contradict the status quo. Single purpose accounts are often recognized as not being here to build the encyclopedia, a valid block reason. Editing is a privilege to work on the project where free speech does not apply. Posts considered to violate policies (including WP:NOTFORUM) may be ignored, collapsed or deleted (WP:TPO).

Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments, look in the archives, and review the FAQ before commenting.

This article was nominated for deletion on August 19, 2006. The result of the discussion was redirect.

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skepticism Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Media Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Mackay Radio
Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

Alternative views Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative viewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative viewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative views articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Websites: Computing Mid‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Podcasting Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Podcasting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of notable podcasts and podcast-related information on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PodcastingWikipedia:WikiProject PodcastingTemplate:WikiProject Podcastingpodcasting articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:

Hanna Kozlowska (4 April 2018). "Facebook has introduced another half-baked effort to fight fake news". Quartz. Archived from the original on 4 April 2018. Retrieved 21 May 2021. It's also unclear which outlets get the "i" icon, and which do not. For example, InfoWars, a media company that is a well-known purveyor of conspiracy theories, does not appear to have the icon on its posts. That means the user would have to leave Facebook to determine the source's trustworthiness, which defeats the purpose of the feature. Other right-wing conspiracy sites, like Gateway Pundit, also do not have an "i" icon. Both of these sites have Wikipedia pages.
Samantha Cole (October 2, 2018). "Wikipedia Bans Right Wing Site Breitbart as a Source for Facts (Including InfoWars)". Motherboard. Retrieved October 5, 2018. Alex Jones' InfoWars and the far-right media outlet Breitbart can't be used as a source of fact in Wikipedia articles anymore, "due to its unreliability."
Adam Smith (October 3, 2018). "Wikipedia Bans Breitbart as Source of Fact (Including InfoWars)". PC Magazine. The right-wing site will still be a source for opinion-related content, but all other citations will be removed. Wikipedia did the same with British newspaper The Daily Mail.
Marcus Gilmer (October 3, 2018). "Wikipedia demotes Breitbart to fake news (Including InfoWars)". Mashable. Retrieved October 5, 2018. Wikipedia, the internet's crowd-sourced encyclopedia, has declared "fake news" on far-right site Breitbart, deeming the outlet an unreliable source for facts.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

This topic contains controversial issues, some of which have reached a consensus for approach and neutrality, and some of which may be disputed. Before making any potentially controversial changes to the article, please carefully read the discussion-page dialogue to see if the issue has been raised before, and ensure that your edit meets all of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please also ensure you use an accurate and concise edit summary.

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 9 November 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

This says Infowars.com is a fake news website and that is 100% false. Do better Wikipedia! Change it please. 2600:6C5C:6BF0:A3F0:D975:3426:F8A:149C (talk) 18:55, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Aoi (青い) (talk) 19:19, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested edit

Requesting to change the last sentence of the lede from "On November 14th, it was revealed that InfoWars was bought by The Onion" to "On November 14th, it was announced that InfoWars was bought by The Onion". Revealing implies it was meant to be a surprise or magic trick or something. guninvalid (talk) 17:26, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest: Change "On November 14, 2024, it was revealed that Global Tetrahedron..." to "On November 14, 2024, it was announced that Global Tetrahedron..." guninvalid (talk) 17:27, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Carguychris (talk) 17:54, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

History section mentions nothing between 1999 and 2016

It just jumps almost 20 years from the founding of the site to the Trump/Alt right years when it started to get in trouble with zero mention of what was on there all that time

Infowars was such a big part of pop culture and the internet in the early 2000s and was a lot more varied and far out along the lines of national enquirer and other tabloid style stories and conspiracies. 2001:56B:9FE6:191D:0:4A:47DA:C101 (talk) 18:00, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 14 November 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Add the following template at top of article, due to the ongoing situation involving an acquisition:

BlunanNation (talk) 20:44, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: Current is only for articles with rapidly-changing information. ViperSnake151 Talk 23:03, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The website has already been shut down

Though I can't use the url as a source, I request that you instead visit it. The only thing you will find on InfoWars.com is a message saying "Site unavailable til further notice."Speakfor23 (talk) 21:07, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Typo

"It is set to hbe relaunched in January 2025" Tony Sutton (talk) 21:10, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Thanks. Grayfell (talk) 21:16, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 15 November 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

In the lead, change "Sandy Hook shootings" for "the Sandy Hook shooting", as the current wording makes it look like it's referring to more than one shooting. Scs52 (talk) 00:13, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done... - Adolphus79 (talk) 17:00, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced claim

On November 14, it was announced that Global Tetrahedron—publishers of the news satire publication The Onion—had acquired the assets of InfoWars, with plans to relaunch it in 2025 as a satirical website.

There are no sources for this claim by ViperSnake151, seems like personal conjecture as evidenced by edit summary "I'd consider the "new" InfoWars a separate publication, switch to using past-tense"

76.86.12.109 (talk) 00:15, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 15 November 2024 (2)

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

In the first sentence it says it "is a far-right conspiracy theory and fake news website."

Please change this to "right wing conspiracy theory and news website."

Saying fake news is biased and not true since all the news on there is not fake. Some may be just like some on any website can be. It's also not far-right. 117.102.115.148 (talk) 00:19, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: Calling it a "news website" is biased because it suggests to the reader that it isn't fake news. It is. And WP:RS back that up. And yes, it's far right. Or at least it was until today. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:26, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Infowars is not dead, it is just being relaunched

Past tense should not used in the opening sentence. Infowars is just being relaunched due to ownership change.138.75.13.45 (talk) 14:29, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well it has not yet been re-launched so we do not know what form it will take. Slatersteven (talk) 14:31, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re-launched may not be the correct word as it is likely to be a parody of its past. O3000, Ret. (talk) 15:01, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is factually accurate to write that InfoWars "was" a far-right, fake-news website, because it isn't one anymore. As for the relaunch, WP:CRYSTAL dictates that we must not phrase the article to present the event as inevitable or guaranteed. Carguychris (talk) 15:45, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
https://www.infowarsstore.com is still active. Using past tense might be confusing to people. 138.75.13.45 (talk) 16:13, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This page is about Infowars, not info wars store. Slatersteven (talk) 16:15, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Infowars is restored

Infowars.com is up and running again right now with the same old content, after a judge blocked the sale. WolfmanFP (talk) 20:14, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 18 November 2024

It is requested that an edit be made to the extended-confirmed-protected article at InfoWars. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)

This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".

The edit may be made by any extended confirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{EEp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.

Please add a source to the intro synopsis, e.g. the NYT source that's already used later in the article.

Replace and the bankruptcy judge put the sale on hold.
with and the bankruptcy judge put the sale on hold.<ref name=nyt>{{cite news |last=Mullin |first=Benjamin |date=November 14, 2024 |title=The Onion Says It Has Bought Infowars, Alex Jones' Site, Out of Bankruptcy |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/14/business/media/alex-jones-infowars-the-onion.html |accessdate=November 14, 2024 |work=The New York Times}}</ref>
Replace to be held the following week.<ref>{{cite news |last=Mullin |first=Benjamin |date=November 14, 2024 |title=The Onion Says It Has Bought Infowars, Alex Jones' Site, Out of Bankruptcy |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/14/business/media/alex-jones-infowars-the-onion.html |accessdate=November 14, 2024 |work=The New York Times}}</ref>
with to be held the following week.<ref name=nyt/> 91.125.241.19 (talk) 19:11, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 22 November 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Add the link to the website for the URL. 23.244.167.108 (talk) 04:07, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We do. Slatersteven (talk) 12:37, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]