Talk:Indian Institute of Management Rohtak

Indian Institute of Management Rohtak was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 4, 2018	Good article nominee	Listed
December 8, 2024	Good article reassessment	Delisted

Current status: Delisted good article

India: Haryana / Education Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Haryana (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Education in India workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 10:47, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

IIM Rohtak Main Building.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:37, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA concerns

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria. Some of my concerns are outlined below:

There are uncited passages throughout the article, including entire paragraphs.
The "The 7th PAN-IIM World Management Conference" section is promotional and not notable for this article, and should probably be removed.
There is a gallery section, which should be removed per WP:NOTGALLERY

Is anyone interested in fixing up this article, or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 02:56, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

Indian Institute of Management Rohtak

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:58, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a lot of uncited passages in the article, including several paragraphs. The "The 7th PAN-IIM World Management Conference" reads as promotional to me and can probably be removed. The gallery at the end of the article should probably be removed per WP:NOTGALLERY and the images redistributed throughout the article or removed. Z1720 (talk) 22:42, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Several passages in this article strike me as promotional. There is also a basic challenge with this topic, that the institute is only 14 years old, and consequently there hasn't been much time for material besides anything based on press releases to accumulate. I would love to be proved wrong about this, but I suspect it is a difficult topic to bring to the GA standard simply because of what the source material is. Vanamonde93 (talk) 22:50, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree this is far from GA. It is also a hard topic to research if you are not Indian. I don't see anyone with the required skills going for this anytime soon. It is a wonderful world (talk) 13:21, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The lede contains bad grammar and way too much detail. The whole thing is really promotional. I suspect that the nomination for good article status is promotional in nature, as well. The photographs placed in the article look like they are AI-generated. -- Melchior2006 (talk) 14:26, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.