Talk:Hypatia transracialism controversy

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

African diaspora Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy Low‑importance

	Philosophy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Feminism Mid‑importance

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies

Tennessee Low‑importance

	Tennessee portal Hypatia transracialism controversy is within the scope of WikiProject Tennessee, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Tennessee and related subjects in the Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, and even become a member. [Project Articles] • [Project Page] • [Project Talk] • [Assessment] • [Template Usage]TennesseeWikipedia:WikiProject TennesseeTemplate:WikiProject TennesseeTennessee
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

1, 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by .

biased presentation of substantive response

The structure and content of this article are significantly biased in favor of Tuvel and the contentions of her article. The 'Social Media Response' section spends more than a paragraph on the personal backlash received by Kelly Oliver, not even the author herself.

The third paragraph does detail some of the substantive criticisms of the article, but only cites one person, despite one of the sources being a comprehensive review of the controversy that could be used to add additional perspectives.

The Rebuttal section presents substantive arguments in support of the article using biased language that presents them as reliable, and the Academic Response section is also heavily weighted in defense of the article, while the objections presented are only based on process, not substance.

The Social Media Response section should open with criticisms of the content of the article, and not simply the namecalling against the author, which obscures the entire basis of the controversy. The McKenzie et al article, source 5, would be a good starting point to add this needed context, and is available in full text at https://archive.ph/GjD4C

This source also links to a 12 page bibliography of race and gender scholarship, which appears to contradict the Smith quote at the end of the Rebuttal section. 2601:445:801:6F30:A862:FB96:645D:C954 (talk) 09:19, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]