This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. Their edits to this article were last checked for neutrality on 26-03-2017 by Luther Blissetts.
A warning about certain sources There is one source on the subject of Hydraulic fracturing in the United Kingdom that represents a Citogenesis or Circular Reporting risk to Wikipedia as they plagiarize verbatim, directly from Wikipedia.[6] Edits which created that version can be found here and in the following edit from 12 August 2013.
The source is 'Nicholas P. Cheremisinoff, Anton Davletshin, edited by Mohit Dayal; (2015) Hydraulic Fracturing Operations: Handbook of Environmental Management Practices, pub. Scrivener Publishing, Berkeley, MA; and should be avoided to prevent a Citogenesis Incident.
Text has been copied to or from this article; see the list below. The source pages now serve to provide attribution for the content in the destination pages and must not be deleted as long as the copies exist. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see the history links below.
This section is very messy and not encyclopedic. Further, the first three references in the section were dead so I have fixed them along with some basic readability changes. I haven't checked the others, but likely some dead links in there too. Crucially, the first reference in the entire page (used 8 times) was dead, which isn't a great advert for the page.
I'm keen to improve this section in a balanced way, my interest being driven by the recent Supreme Court ruling on the Horse Hill facility in Sussex, and the way downstream Scope 3 emissions are accounted in EIAs for fracking projects in the UK.
I'll keep chipping away and may make some larger single edits where content is repetitive and can be brought into a better paragraph. I'll see how I go. Overall, very surprised how undeveloped this section is considering the amount of attention fracking has in the news over the last 10 years. PutTheKettleOn (talk) 10:14, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]