Talk:Hugh Johns

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hugh Johns article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Football Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wales Low‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Hugh Johns appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 July 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Hugh Johns commentated for England's only FIFA World Cup victory during his first year as a commentator?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/July.

Wikipedia

Start classification

I have classified this article as a start. It could do with expansion on Johns' life and career. As yet, I haven't added anything about his early life. Capitalistroadster 07:27, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hugh's birth

Seems the freemason site was a little mistaken in both the year and place. I could not find Hugh anywhere in 1923 when checking the GRO Indexes, but did pin him down in late 1922. You got six weeks to register a birth, so a listing in the following quarter was entirely acceptable.

As for the place, it's possible the family moved to Farnham when Hugh was very young and Hugh simply thought he was born there. I plan to email the masons about this. Analog Kid 21:12, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Analog Kid for your work on this. Capitalistroadster 03:51, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- No problem. I do genealogy as a hobby, so enjoy the research.

Had word back from the masons today and it turns out they had conflicting data, their original records saying '22 but other external sources saying '23. After taking a look at the evidence, the contact I made there agreed with my assessment and changed the text of the obituary. Analog Kid 13:50, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Date format

This isn't a flame to anyone, just a thought. Wikipedia is a worldwide encyclopedia, not just an American one. Perhaps Americans make more updates than anyone else, hence the prevalence of US date-format on everything, however I haven't seen a rule saying they have to be displayed that way. Hugh was British, ergo I used British format. I think it's more logical anyway to work from the smallest unit of time up to the largest.

If it's a problem for anyone, feel free to change the dates back again. I just don't believe every page needs to be standardised to American by default, that's all. Analog Kid 21:40, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edits because the functionality you want (choice of how to display dates) is included in everyone's "My preferences": under "Date and time", you can select which way round you want things to appear. That way, everyone's happy and edit wars are avoided. Bencherlite 14:27, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Fair enough, I didn't know about that feature. I guess as Wikipedia was started in the US, their date format is the set standard, but it's good they've coded in the alternative for UK and European visitors. Thanks for the 411. Analog Kid 13:06, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hugh Johns. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130511125753/http://homepage.ntlworld.com/carousel/StarSoccer.html to http://homepage.ntlworld.com/carousel/StarSoccer.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:47, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hugh Johns. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928043922/http://www.province.org.uk/Temp/20070627_hrlj_obituary.htm to http://www.province.org.uk/Temp/20070627_hrlj_obituary.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:09, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]