Talk:Hillclimbing (railway)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Any details of what normal gradients could be expected in modern railways?
- I think about 1% grade (1 unit of vertical difference per 100 units of horizontal distance) would be considered in the "normal" range. 2% would already be pretty steep, although there are railways that are much steeper (such as Flåmsbana in Norway with about 5% grade, without rack).
- Passenger-only railroads could easily be steeper than those served by freight trains, since the vehicles are usually lighter.--CodeGeneratR 23:48, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Stiffen?
[edit]Hi :) The use of the word 'stiffen' to describe an increase in gradient seems a bit colloquial to my (non-railway expert) ears. Would it be perhaps better to use the word "steepen" i.e. to increase in steepness? Thanks, Oliver —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 60.234.251.100 (talk) 03:38, August 24, 2007 (UTC)
Redruth & Chasewater at Portreath
[edit]The Redruth & Chasewater didn't go to Portreath, it went to the south coast at Devoran.
Portreath, like many, sits in a steep valley?? Like many ports it sits at sea level.Afterbrunel (talk) 20:45, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
Unexplanatory explanation
[edit]This specific page looks like written only for those who already know about the thing which not only defeats the purpose of but its actually the opposite of a Encyclopedia. I can also tell by the other sections on the talks that that issue has prevailed since this page’s conception…
AstralChojin (talk) 09:38, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Charging towards the hill
[edit]The suggestion in "Track type" that track formation is strengthened on the approaches to hills, so that trains may take a run at them, is unreferenced. Marked {{CN}}. I'm a bit doubtful of this, but perhaps someone can come along and put me on the right track. --AntientNestor (talk) 10:08, 30 November 2024 (UTC)