This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This redirect is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket
There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)
This article seemed obviously non-notable to me that I added the Proposed Deletion template. But this was removed because of the WP:CRIN. This shook the very foundation of my understanding of Wikipedia! I can't believe that it's notable that a person who played cricket on one occasion for Sussex in 1829 where he scored a duck in one innings and was not out in the other innings is notable enough to have a whole article on Wikipedia. That is surely of such marginal importance in the history of Sussex Cricket Club. Having said that, it might be important to them (that's their business), but not necessasry to everybody else. What's so special about Henry Ayres? I would argue that the nature of cricket in 1829 does not have any relationship with the modern game. There's a perfectly good page about him on the Cricket Archive website for anyone interested in old cricket facts. I thought Wikipedia wasn't supposed to be a mirror? I should add that I support Sussex Cricket Club, but this article really seems unecessary. There must be a limit to Wikipedia! I mean, I was in a traffic jam in London last night for an hour and half. Should that go in? It was pretty notable for me and the hundreds of people stuck in it! "Embankment Traffic Disruption 7 February 2016" Oh, well. Seaweed (talk) 14:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]