This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Composers, a group of editors writing and developing biographical articles about composers of all eras and styles. The project discussion page is the place to talk about technical and editorial issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!ComposersWikipedia:WikiProject ComposersTemplate:WikiProject ComposersComposers
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Just a very minor comment. I would have made the change myself but just conforming if or not I am missing something. There seems to be something odd about formatting of page number of Ref#176 (Ref of the image caption of the "Reputation and Berlioz scholarship" section). – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 19:11, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have a related question: is the use of {{webarchive}} a deliberate stylistic choice, or more of a holdover from earlier days before it was wrapped into the CS1|2 templates? I get 34 matches for "Wayback" in my browser, some rather clustered. Folly Mox (talk) 09:52, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The use of webarchive reflects that the article's inline citation style is non-template-based. (A couple of templates had snuck in and I've addressed those). Nikkimaria (talk) 14:24, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Whoops! I snuck those in, whilst sneaking out several other, broken templates that InternetArchiveBot had left behind like trail of bent washers. Thank you for cleaning up after me. I wonder if manually formatting the archives as well might leave the references tidier looking than {{webarchive}} does, but I'll not test that myself. Folly Mox (talk) 04:12, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
level-4 vital article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
