Talk:Grand master (order)

This article was nominated for deletion on 24 October 2015. The result of the discussion was keep.

Orders, decorations, and medals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of orders, decorations, and medals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Orders, decorations, and medalsWikipedia:WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medalsTemplate:WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medalsOrders, decorations, and medals
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article/category

If the article was decided to "keep", then why was its subsequent category, Category:Grand Masters, deleted? Chicbyaccident (talk) 10:45, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 27 October 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved (non-admin closure) Fuortu (talk) 23:22, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

– To make room for new article place. Arguments: Since most of its current content could be considered secondary to the content in the article Grand Master (order). Why? It only corresponds to English language phenonomens (WP:Global) and only to things after 20th century. The question about "Grand Master" and "Grandmaster" could find a simple solution with "also called" notice on the lead section comme-il-faut. Chicbyaccident (Please notify with {{SUBST:re}} (Talk) 10:53, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose several of the subjects are capital G capital M. In ictu oculi (talk) 11:27, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose clearly no absolute topic here and certainly not Grand Master (order) In ictu oculi (talk) 11:26, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above. @Chicbyaccident: Unless you can provide evidence that Grand Master (order) is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, this looks like a request that can be closed quickly — Andy W. (talk) 02:37, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK, arguments added. Chicbyaccident (Please notify with {{SUBST:re}} (Talk) 12:24, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: I don't even understand the offered rationale. If there's a primary topic here, I would suspect it to be Grandmaster (chess). —BarrelProof (talk) 05:53, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – It is easily confused with the widely used chess title, even though it does not use a space. 207.161.217.209 (talk) 21:42, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I fixed the malformed multiple page move request in this edit. Steel1943 (talk) 21:59, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.