Talk:German ostrubel

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Numismatics Mid‑importance

	Numismatics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumismaticsWikipedia:WikiProject NumismaticsTemplate:WikiProject Numismaticsnumismatic
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: World War I Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	World War I task force

On 5 November 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to German ostruble. The result of the discussion was not moved.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on German ostruble. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060206104855/http://aes.iupui.edu/RWISE/countries/germany1.html to http://aes.iupui.edu/rwise/countries/germany1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:06, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 5 November 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) ^Clyde!_Franklin! 12:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

German ostrubel → German ostruble – Yes, the bills do say "[number] Rubel", but beyond that, there are little (non-OR) sources regarding how this former currency should be spelt. Therefore, in the interest of article title stability, I propose to move this page back to its former, stable title at "German ostruble", used from 2006 to 2022. Thank you. NotReallySoroka (talk) 15:58, 5 November 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:42, 13 November 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:54, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Leaning oppose on this, because ostrubel is a legitimate German compound, while "ostruble" appears to be a made-up "Deutschlish" chimera. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 20:13, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose why deliberately misspell something? In ictu oculi (talk) 09:42, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oswald Lehnich Währung und Wirtschaft in Polen, Litauen, Lettland und Estland 1923 "Gelangte der schwankende russische Rubel auf einen Kurs von 2 Mark , sodass in diesem Augenblick ein russischer Rubel gleich einem Ostrubel war , dann war der Wechsel der Währung Doch sprachen während des noch besonders vereinfacht ." In ictu oculi (talk) 09:43, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose and move to simple Ostrubel, which already redirects here. No need for "German". -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:30, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment: Thoughts on moving to Ostrubel instead? Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:42, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Ostrubel. Ostruble would be a second choice. Current disambiguation is unnecessary. It's possible that a case can be made for changing the spelling, but none has been made yet. Andrewa (talk) 11:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support - a check of sources (something the "oppose" votes above seem to have completely neglected to do) suggests that the proposed title is indeed the WP:COMMONNAME. See for example [1][2][3] I see very few English sources using the "Ostrubel" spelling. It may seem "wrong" to some, but that's our job to determine. Neutral on whether it shoulid be German ostruble or just plain Ostruble. — Amakuru (talk) 14:36, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note as well, that the title was stable at German ostruble until a bold undiscussed move two months ago. This should have just been straight-up reverted. — Amakuru (talk) 14:38, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment: One more relist to consider Amakuru's comments. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:54, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reject Amakuru's reasons, sorry no justification for a deliberate misspelling. No need to relist. Nom has failed. In ictu oculi (talk) 18:09, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Examples of sources using Ostrubel: [4], [5], [6], [7]. I think usage is divided, if not in favor of ostrubel, and the word is largely unassimilated into English. Adumbrativus (talk) 08:38, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.