Talk:Geek humor

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Delete, April 22 2012, see discussion.
no consensus, March 11 2011, see discussion.
no consensus, July 25 2010, see discussion.

Humor

There is some humor is this article recreation, to be sure. If its to stay as a disamb. type page, it will require monitoring.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 15:24, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It was recreated by the guy who nominated it for deletion in the final AFD. Dream Focus 15:59, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I find that fascinating. I guess I can simply move the content I created (I saved a copy) into one of the other articles, meaning nothing will really be deleted.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 16:01, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Nothing unusual. You can always find a right place in wikipedia for properly referenced facts. Happens all the time: info about nonnotable wives of notable husbands, nonnotable books of notable writers, dormitories of universities, etc. By the way, the article was not "recreated". Disambiguation pages are not "articles": they are tools for navigation within wikipedia. Staszek Lem (talk) 17:10, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Milowent, if you are serious about the jokes, I would suggest you to draw distinction between two types of humor which are referred to with the same term "geek humor": humor of geeks and humor about geeks. The most important difference is that the second kind is mostly of deprecating kind. This is what I noticed during the brief google search (and what I wanted to reflect in the disambig page, but someone disagreed). Staszek Lem (talk) 18:02, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]