Talk:Fun run
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
List of fun runs
[edit]I'm thinking we should clean up this list to restrict it to notable or large fun runs, since the complete list of fun runs is unmanageably large (at least thousands annually). Perhaps fun runs which have at least one independent citation in a reliable source? That seems to be the best match to Wikipedia policy generally. Thoughts? Vectro (talk) 19:48, 4 August 2010 (UTC)