Talk:Flocking (texture)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts

Textile arts Low‑importance

	Clothing portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Textile arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of textile arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Textile artsWikipedia:WikiProject Textile artsTemplate:WikiProject Textile artsTextile arts
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

This article is inadequate -- it gives many examples of flocking, but it never says what flocking actually is.

It does say what flocking is

"Flocking is the application of fine particles to adhesive coated surfaces." My issue is with the term "magical and special." I never saw a flocked base and thought it was magical, lol. Also, a picture would be nice.

Repetition

It seems that this article repeats itself. Could we decide which version of the description/definition is to be kept (I also loled at the 'magical' bit) and clear the other one? An t isora 16:30, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, this needs to be changed. This is an advertisement for flocking right now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.60.89.182 (talk) 02:47, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge from flocking machine

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result was merge.

The flocking machine article is quite short and I think redundant to the "process" section already in this article, so it makes sense to me to merge them. Wizard191 (talk) 18:02, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As it's been a while with no response to this idea - I went ahead and did the merge. I included info on flocking machines into this article and did a redirect - but Im struggling to find decent sourcing for the whole thing, hence the ag. --Errant Tmorton166^(Talk) 14:22, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Removing diagram

I'm going to remove the diagram at the top of the page which shows all the fibers aligned to straight up from the surface, like velvet. This seems to be an incorrect representation of flocking, based on the text of the article and an image search (although a correct representation of velvet or grass). My apologies to user:LaurensvanLieshout. The vertical particles fit with the description "Flock material flies vertically onto the substrate attaching to previously applied glue" in the "process" section (which was the content of the "Flocking machine" article), but they don't fit the model grass which has randomly aligned particles, or the description of fake frost used on Christmas trees. Presumably 18th century flock can't have used an electrostatic process and so can't have had vertically aligned fibers either, but I'm not sure about that. Card Zero (talk) 23:53, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]