Talk:FictionBook
This article was nominated for deletion on 31 March 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Sorry for my bad english, I'm from Belarus. Please translate my words to readable english. --Sclex 21:34, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
change to a redirect
[edit]The other similar products in the list of e-book readers do not have articles of their own, and it is not clear why this should be an exception. I therefore propose to incorporate the additional important & useful contents into the part on the ebook page, and retain this page as a redirect crossreference to that section. This will actually get it more visible among the others of its category. If you think this would be inappropriate, let me know, for there is then a formal process for the deletion of the article by group consensus where you will be able to contest the proposed change. DGG 05:28, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
FB2 is not a e-book reader, it is quite known and localy popular standart and format. I Think we should keep this page. --altious (talk) 18:18, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
ePub
[edit]How does this differ from ePub, another XML-based Ebook standard? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Abdelazer (talk • contribs) 01:06, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- In contrary to ePub FictionBook eBook contains just 1 xml-like file. Images (and possibly other binary data) are converted to BASE64 and reside inside the <binary> tag. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.216.219.61 (talk) 05:15, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
fb3
[edit]As far as it seems, this page only covers 2nd version of this format. It need to include discriptions of FictionBook3 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.75.90.8 (talk) 10:58, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
updated the main page
[edit]I took the liberty to correct the page in a few minor details and add the existance of FB3.